In a candid confession, the singer MakSim revealed that during a period of coma his relatives attempted to maneuver the transfer of his assets into their hands. He spoke about this in a long conversation with Nadezhda Strelets, a dialogue that was subsequently published and circulated in media channels. The revelation sheds light on a troubling chapter in the artist’s life, where trust and family dynamics collided with financial vulnerability. MakSim described how, during the most disorienting time of his illness, those closest to him began contemplating ways to secure control over his property as if to safeguard, or perhaps capitalize on, what remained of his affairs.
He said that his entire world was upended while he was unconscious in the hospital. Some individuals, he noted, started pressing to adopt his children in an effort to facilitate the transfer of his wealth to themselves. It later emerged that some papers had already been signed on his behalf, with the signatures attributed to him after the fact. The singer emphasized that there were attempts to imitate his own signature, a deception that only came to light once he regained consciousness and was able to review the records. This sequence of events painted a stark picture of manipulation at a time when the artist was most vulnerable and in no position to defend himself. The dramatic statement underscores how quickly personal and legal matters can be twisted in the wake of a health crisis, especially when the person at the center is incapacitated and under medical duress.
On August 15, MakSim recalled the moment of realization when the scale of the actions of others became clear. He asserted that some of his loved ones took advantage of the situation by swiping documents to sign on his behalf, a breach of trust that he contends stretched across a broad circle of people. He described himself as someone who can become remarkably gentle when under the influence, a characterization he offered to explain the context in which these breaches occurred. The singer noted that many individuals benefited from these documents, with significant sums being moved or locked away in arrangements that he had no way to contest at the time. He admitted that he had entrusted people he had known for years, and, as a consequence, those who had once been within his inner circle were no longer part of his life after the truth emerged. The narrative emphasizes the heavy toll of misplaced trust and the gravity of financial exploitation during periods of weakness, a theme that resonates with many who have faced similar situations in the public eye.
MakSim stressed that the money was not something he intended to reclaim through force. He explained that, having faced the unraveling of those events, he chose to accept responsibility for the wider circumstances and the mistakes he believed he had made in trusting others. He described a sense of having surrendered to the reality of the situation and acknowledged his role in allowing people to operate in ways that were not in his best interests. The admission signals a nuanced reflection on accountability and the limits of personal protection when health, fame, and family matters intersect with legal and financial processes.
Additionally, MakSim spoke about the broader pattern of behavior that followed a severe illness. He revealed that his rehabilitation period had included struggles with alcoholism, a challenge that complicated both public perception and his own personal recovery. He indicated that an earlier return to performing—driven perhaps by the instinct to resume a normal routine—was followed by a relapse into drinking, a cycle that hindered his path to stability. According to the artist, this sequence contributed to a phase where he attempted to sustain himself through alcohol, a choice that, while understandable in moments of strain, had lasting implications for his health and career. The remarks illuminate the difficult relationship between illness, recovery, and the pressures of life in the spotlight, illustrating how personal vulnerabilities can intersect with professional obligations in complicated ways.
In related remarks, there were mentions of a prior public discussion led by Tatyana Bulanova that highlighted the emotional intensity surrounding performances and tours. Bulanova had described the anticipation and excitement that accompany a concert, offering a glimpse into the emotional labor that underpins a successful musical itinerary. Taken together, these accounts sketch a portrait of a life marked by both achievement and hardship, where public achievement sits alongside private battles. The ongoing narrative underscores the importance of safeguarding personal and financial interests when health and fame intersect, and it calls for a mindful approach to trust and support networks in difficult times.