The Safe Internet League has approached the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation with a request to cancel a planned solo tour by rapper Loqiemean, whose real name is Roman Khudyakov. This information was reported through a telegraph channel by Ekaterina Mizulina, who heads the Safe Internet League and serves as its spokesperson in this matter.
The appeal highlights concerns over the conduct of Khudyakov, who has publicly opposed the Russian military operation. The League filed the complaint against the artist and the broader campaign surrounding his performances, arguing that the activities in question could be interpreted as a challenge to state policy and public order. A document attached to Mizulina’s post indicates that the concerts are tentatively scheduled to take place in several Russian cities as part of a May touring schedule.
The appeal asserts that the organization and planning of Loqiemean’s concerts infringe upon the rights and interests of minors, a priority protected by the Russian constitution and reflected in national policy. The League emphasizes the responsibility of cultural events to safeguard young audiences from content that could be deemed inappropriate or destabilizing to social norms.
Former rapper Akim Apachev has joined the call to cancel Loqiemean’s Russia tour, joining a growing group of voices urging authorities to scrutinize the artists involved in the performances. The appeal requests a formal check into Khudyakov for alleged discrediting of the Russian Armed Forces, prompting the Prosecutor General’s Office to forward inquiries to several state bodies, including the Investigative Committee, the Ministry of Culture, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, and the presidential administration, for review and possible action.
Earlier reports indicated that activists in Perm had petitioned to cancel the concerts, citing claims of donations from the Ukrainian Armed Forces as part of the tour’s financing. The organizers had planned the first show of the tour for May 8 in Novosibirsk, a detail that drew additional attention to the event and the surrounding debates about freedom of expression, state support for the arts, and the boundaries of political discourse in contemporary Russia. Source: Telegram channel reports via Ekaterina Mizulina.
In the broader context, supporters of the Safe Internet League argue that public figures and performers should avoid appearing at events that could be interpreted as endorsing subversive actions or undermining national unity. They contend that the state has a legitimate interest in supervising cultural programming to protect underage audiences and to maintain social cohesion during periods of national security emphasis. Critics, on the other hand, emphasize the importance of artistic freedom and political pluralism, warning against punitive measures that could stifle legitimate creative expression. Observations compiled from party statements and media coverage.
The situation underscores a larger, ongoing debate about how authorities balance artistic expression with national security concerns and public welfare. It also highlights how organizations focused on digital safety and public morality — such as the Safe Internet League — view cultural events as potential vectors for influence, especially when youth audiences are involved. The case also raises questions about how disinformation and external funding claims are evaluated within the framework of legal processes and what standards are applied when assessing the potential impact of performances on society.
As the legal and administrative review proceeds, observers note the importance of transparent procedures and the protection of constitutional rights. They point out that any decision affecting artistic programming should be grounded in clear legal criteria and consistent with established norms governing freedom of expression, public order, and the protection of minors. The ongoing discussions demonstrate how public policy, culture, and digital safety intersect in contemporary Russia, particularly in the context of controversial performances and international perceptions of state-societal relations.