TV presenter Ksenia Borodina has not offered any remarks about the work of her former colleague Olga Buzova at Dom-2. This stance was reported by the Telegram channel Star, which noted Borodina’s decision to refrain from discussing Buzova’s professional activities. The presenter explained that she does not consider it appropriate to comment on Buzova’s work, and she also declined to speak about the artist’s private life. In her words, the relationship between them is professional rather than personal, and she prefers to keep the focus on their respective careers rather than on private matters.
Borodina emphasized that Buzova remains a former colleague, and that commenting on her private life would feel inappropriate. This boundary-setting reflects a desire to avoid mudslinging or personal critiques that could be seen as disrespectful or unproductive, especially given their shared history on a long-running project. The presenter suggested that when colleagues who once shared a stage go their separate ways, it is wise to maintain professional courtesy and refrain from personal commentary that could misrepresent either party or inflame tensions.
The two actresses have a documented history of tension that attracted public attention. In February 2022, a dispute emerged between Borodina and Buzova that drew widespread media coverage. Buzova claimed that Borodina had not personally voiced her concerns to her, instead voicing all criticisms behind her back and sharing negativity without direct engagement. According to Buzova, the situation reached a turning point when, after Borodina left the show, her former partner David Manukyan was invited to join as a presenter. Buzova expressed disappointment that Borodina did not intervene to influence this outcome or to prevent what she perceived as a unilateral decision affecting the on-screen dynamic.
Responding to these accusations, Borodina rejected the statements attributed to her former colleague. She argued that Buzova’s portrayal of self-sacrifice was inconsistent with the realities of the situation and suggested that the personal narrative around the conflict did not accurately reflect a shared truth. Borodina stated that she did not bear responsibility for Manukyan’s appointment, underscoring a distinction between professional choices made by the program and the personal dynamics among participants. The exchange highlighted how public personalities can become entangled in narratives about loyalty, influence, and responsibility, especially when roles on a popular show are in play and public opinion remains highly engaged.
Throughout this episode, both sides presented versions of events aimed at shaping a narrative that would resonate with fans and the wider audience. The broader takeaway centers on the importance of boundary-setting in public discourse, particularly when individuals have a long-standing working relationship and then move on to different creative projects. It also underscores how media platforms can amplify disagreements, sometimes transforming private disputes into ongoing public conversations that continue to be dissected by viewers, commentators, and industry insiders. In the end, Borodina’s decision to refrain from commenting on Buzova’s professional work or private life reflects a broader principle: when a collaboration ends, it is often healthier to preserve professional respect and avoid rehashing past tensions in a way that could obscure current professional paths and future collaborations.