A dialogue from a HiFi Streaming Sound podcast called Nothing Sacred features musician DJ Smash, whose real name is Andrey Shirman. The discussion centers on the party culture surrounding Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprio.
The guest recounts events from one of the gatherings where DiCaprio allegedly recorded himself and other attendees using their mobile devices. The account describes how the host took phones, placed them on a white label, and captured footage from both sides of the interaction. Attendees reportedly reacted positively, interpreting the action as a sign that the party would be memorable rather than intrusive. DJ Smash reflects on these moments, recounting them as part of his overall memory of the night.
During the same podcast recording, host Mark Anderson asked DJ Smash about the song With a Flying Gait, which Yuri Antonov reportedly used in his work. Shirman responded that he had not purchased the track and had not reached out to Antonov about the copyright. He adds that Antonov had been attempting to contact him, which added a layer of tension to the conversation around the music rights involved in the party scene.
Shirman explains that there was a realization that a direct meeting with the artist might not be necessary. He notes that the artist had already given an interview indicating that an encounter might be possible in the future, and this exchange influenced how Shirman viewed the potential for collaboration or confrontation over the piece. The musician laughs at the notion that the situation would escalate, portraying it as a moment of comic irony rather than a serious dispute.
In a broader sense, the podcast positions these incidents against the backdrop of the entertainment industry’s often glamorous yet complicated party culture. It reflects on how high-profile gatherings can blur lines between privacy and public performance, and how music rights can become a central point of discussion among industry participants. The interview with Shirman contributes to a larger conversation about consent, recording at private events, and the responsibilities that come with celebrity influence in social settings. It also raises questions about how artists and performers navigate copyright issues when their work intersects with live experiences at public or semi-public events.
Earlier remarks by a music critic highlighted notable attendees of the Star Factory program, situating the current dialogue within a wider context of industry commentary about visibility and opportunity in the music scene. The discussion reinforces the idea that contemporary party culture, celebrity influence, and intellectual property rights are intertwined themes that surface repeatedly in media coverage and artistic discourse. The exchange leaves listeners with a sense of the practical and legal complexities that can accompany high-profile gatherings, along with a reminder that personal narratives from insiders often illuminate broader industry dynamics.