Rapper Guf, whose real name is Alexey Dolmatov, took part in a live broadcast hosted by his sister Olga and found himself entangled in a heated family dispute with a relative. The confrontation was captured and later quoted by StarHit, presenting a blunt and dramatic glimpse into their personal tensions.
During the exchange, Guf insisted that there was no need for Olga to manage or curate his concert program. He asserted that he already had a manager who handled those responsibilities and that Olga should step back and let professional duties proceed as usual. He suggested that if there were any changes to the team, they should be made through the proper channels, signaling a firm stance on who controls the agenda for his performances. The moment underscored a long standing expectation among fans that the artist would maintain his own professional boundaries, even when family members are involved in business or logistics related to his work.
The conversation then shifted toward financial ties between the siblings. Guf proposed severing all monetary relations between him and Olga, arguing that there had been a misstep in how financial matters had been handled in the past. He claimed he had been dealt a financial blow that could threaten his own property and assets, expressing a desire to disentangle from any arrangements that might risk further loss. The claim emphasized a sense of distrust and the seriousness with which he viewed the current financial bond with his sister, alongside concerns about how revenues and responsibilities are shared within their family dynamic.
On December 12, Olga publicly stated that Guf would not be managing rappers’ business affairs for the foreseeable future. She clarified that their professional collaboration would not continue under the same terms and indicated that a pause in partnership was likely, given the evolving circumstances surrounding the artist. The message set a clear boundary, signaling that future cooperation would need to be carefully reconsidered and possibly restructured to fit new priorities and health considerations that have influenced both siblings’ actions.
Dolmatova later explained that she was opposed to proceeding with a performance under the existing conditions. She conveyed empathy toward her brother’s health challenges, noting that his current health needs should be prioritized and that he might benefit from completing medical treatment before committing to any forthcoming concerts. While she expressed understanding of his situation, she also made it plain that she could no longer oversee her brother’s business affairs while his health status remained uncertain. In her view, the decision about a concert would ultimately rest with Guf himself, reflecting a shift toward personal accountability and self-directed choices during a difficult period.
By December 15, it was reported that Guf had performed a concert in Moscow, a decision some interpreted as a deliberate act aimed at provoking or signaling to his ex-wife and sister, whom he had referenced during the show. The timing and content of the performance drew attention to ongoing personal and professional frictions, prompting observers to reevaluate the relationship dynamics and the potential implications for future appearances and collaborations. The incident highlighted how the artist’s public appearances can intersect with private disputes, creating a narrative that fans and media will continue to watch closely.
In the broader context, notable figures in the music scene, including Timati, have previously commented on delays or gaps in releasing new music from Guf. This back story adds another layer to the public discourse around the artist, illustrating how personal events, business decisions, and creative output intersect in the lives of contemporary rappers. The ongoing conversation underscores the volatility that can accompany fame, family ties, and the pressures of sustaining a prolific musical career while navigating complicated personal relationships.