The public chapter surrounding the rapper Guf, whose real name is Alexey Dolmatov, continues to unfold as new statements emerge from both his former partner and those who observed the online discussions. Julia Koroleva, the rapper’s former spouse, reappears in the narrative after a long pause in social media activity. A recent video shared by an older post from the artist shows Koroleva’s crying appeal, urging for possession of her passport so she can travel with their child from Thailand. In a separate moment, she shared an image on Instagram displaying a hand with an IV drip, a stark symbol that drew attention to the broader tensions surrounding the case. The individual who owns the platform associated with the post is recognized by many observers as controversial and facing bans in certain jurisdictions.
The message posted from Moscow asserted that Tina was safe and in good spirits, with a note of gratitude for the support and the experience gained during the difficult period. The public response to these events included the rapper deleting the videos from his page, yet the surrounding controversy continued to spread across social networks. In the released content, the young woman describes distress related to her husband and even mentions considering contacting law enforcement. She accuses Guf of alleged involvement with illegal substances, stating that the drugs allegedly affected his energy and behavior rather than her actions. Amid the allegations and the rising chatter online, rumors regarding the possible separation of the couple began to circulate more widely.
As the situation developed, there were questions about Guf’s exact whereabouts, with information about his current location remaining unclear. In another vein, Isa, the rapper’s former wife, offered public remarks about Guf’s condition in the wake of rumors about his relationship status, contributing to a complex and debated timeline that fans and followers continue to track. The ongoing dialogue reflects a broader pattern in which celebrity relationships, personal disputes, and media coverage intersect to shape public perception. It remains essential for readers to consider the reliability of direct statements and to recognize the evolving nature of such stories as new information becomes available.