A former member of the reality program House-2, Ventseslav Vengrzhanovsky, issued a response to remarks made by Olesya Malibu and Nikolai Dolzhansky during an episode of Epic Fighting Champion. The coverage comes from StarHit, which reported the exchange in detail.
During the broadcast, Malibu stated that his fights are exclusively with men and asserted that Vengrzhanovsky belongs in a class with male opponents of his own weight category. She suggested that Malibu believed Vengrzhanovsky often avoids fighting women, expressing the view that the actress was acting in a manner she considered defensive rather than confrontational. The remarks reflected a broader topic in the show about gender and competition, and Malibu offered her perspective on how battles should be framed within the sport.
Dolzhansky, another former House-2 participant, aligned with Malibu in their critique of Vengrzhanovsky. He characterized him as unprepared for direct competition, using a sharp personal dig about Vengrzhanovsky and his private life. The confrontation included taunts about personal circumstances, highlighting tension both on and off the screen as the participants debated the nature of strength and readiness for competitive fighting.
In addressing the claims, Vengrzhanovsky told Malibu that there had been no violence toward the women on the show. He insisted that his focus has been on disputes involving adults who provoke rather than on any harm toward females off the set. StarHit reported that Malibu later described him with a harsh term, underscoring the intensity of their clash and the ongoing public dispute surrounding the participants.
Earlier reports mentioned that Vengrzhanovsky, known for his appearances on House-2, was going through a personal transition, with his wife at the time reflecting publicly on the marriage as a significant challenge. These personal developments were noted as part of the broader narrative surrounding the individuals involved, emphasizing how public life and private relationships sometimes intersect within reality television circles. The surrounding dialogue on the program illustrated how contestants interpret rivalry, fame, and personal boundaries in a high-pressure media environment.
Overall, the episode captured a moment of high tension and sharp exchanges among former reality show participants as they navigated questions of masculine identity, performance, and public scrutiny. The discourse highlighted the varying perspectives on who should compete under which conditions and how personal history can color perceptions of fairness and sportsmanship. While viewers were offered a vivid snapshot of the drama, the participants appeared to reiterate their positions, each defending their stance in the ongoing conversation about competition and respect on screen. The episode served as a reminder that reality television can magnify disagreements and turn them into broader conversations about competition, gender norms, and media ethics in contemporary entertainment. (Source attribution: StarHit)