Zepyur Brutyan spoke about the news surrounding his father, addressing the arrest and the charges that have been reported. In a measured, calm tone, the actor publicly rejected the notion that his family is facing serious legal trouble. He asserted that the circulating accounts are nothing more than misinformation and stories designed to sensationalize a private life that he says remains peaceful and intact.
Brutyan emphasized that some observers seem unsettled by the stability and happiness his family enjoys. He suggested that a faction of the public may be intent on tarnishing their reputation and creating a narrative that does not reflect reality. In his view, these attempts to smear the family are driven by envy or malice rather than facts, and he urged listeners to question where such rumors originate and who benefits from spreading them.
From the actor’s perspective, there is a recognizable source behind the rumors about his relatives. He claimed to know who started the chatter and to be aware of how it travels through online spaces and media channels. This awareness, he indicated, helps explain why the information appears in multiple places and gains traction despite lacking verification.
Brutyan concluded that there are identifiable pathways through which rumors are introduced into public discourse. He said he understands the mechanics of how the allegations spread, and he expressed confidence that the truth about the family would emerge as the conversation continues. He also signaled a resolve to hold lines of communication open, ensuring that honest updates can reach fans and supporters without distortion.
Despite requests for clarity, he did not disclose the current whereabouts of his father or confirm any legal issues at the present moment. The ambiguity around the family matter remained, with no explicit statements about detention or location from Brutyan or his representatives. This reluctance to disclose specifics appears to be a choice aimed at protecting private family matters while still addressing public curiosity respectfully.
Meanwhile, a Telegram channel reported new activity in Moscow in connection with an incident on the night of the 21st. The channel claimed that investigators visited a residence in the Ryazan district, uncovering a number of gaming machines in what appeared to be an ordinary apartment. The report alleged that law enforcement officers found eight slot machines and detained three individuals on charges related to running an illegal enterprise. The individuals named in the report included a 57-year-old man listed as Arshak Brutyan, an unemployed 26-year-old named İlgam K., and a 55-year-old named Artashes T. The account described a setup that raised questions about organized crime and unlawful business practices in a setting far removed from typical entertainment venues.
Official authorities later commented on the detention, describing the incident without naming those involved in the operation. The statement suggested routine procedural updates and clarified that further details would be released as the investigation progressed. The absence of personal identifiers in the official commentary stood in contrast to the granular detail present in social media narratives, highlighting the gap between live online speculation and formal legal communication.
In a broader frame, the situation intersects with past actions in the business landscape connected to high-profile names. Earlier reporting noted that federal authorities had taken steps affecting a public figure named Alexander Revva, with the tax service dissolving a business in Russia affiliated with that name. While the present case involves different individuals and circumstances, the linkage points to the way state authorities monitor financial and corporate activities, sometimes leading to cascading media coverage that touches a wide circle of relatives, associates, and fans. Observers are reminded that corporate and legal affairs can become intertwined with personal narratives, producing headlines that blur the line between professional outcomes and private life.