TV presenter and psychologist Roza Syabitova recently shared her perspective on why many young people hesitate to start families. Speaking on a telegraph channel, she emphasized that the resistance is often rooted in the painful experiences that flowed from their parents’ marriages and separations. These experiences are not just memories but enduring emotional imprints that shape how younger generations view lasting commitment.
From a psychological angle, Syabitova explains that anger and frustration can surface when discussions about traditional family values are framed as rigid expectations. Many young adults have watched relationships that ended poorly, including cases where one or both parents faced repeated divorces. Those memories can foster skepticism about the feasibility of a stable partnership and lead to a cautious approach to forming one’s own family. The impact extends beyond individuals; it resonates through families and communities, creating broader hesitation about marriage and parenting.
Syabitova also highlights how familial models influence trust. She notes that girls who grow up without a steady father figure may develop doubts about male trustworthiness, while boys who witness a lack of mutual respect between spouses may fear commitment. Her viewpoint underscores the importance of open dialogue between parents and children. Rather than moralizing or insisting on a single path, families should seek conversation and compromise that reflect the needs and experiences of both sides. The aim is to break the cycle of silence and replace it with constructive exchanges that help younger generations see possibilities for healthier relationships.
According to Syabitova, the emphasis should be on showing practical examples of successful interpersonal connections. Real life demonstrations of loving, respectful partnerships can speak louder than grand statements about how relationships should unfold. The message does not advocate abandoning values but rather adapting them to modern realities. When youths observe models of cooperation, trust, and mutual respect, they are more likely to envision themselves as part of a stable family unit. Guidance should come in the form of lived experiences, not dictated rules.
In closing, the expert stresses that pointing toward hopeful, attainable relationship outcomes matters more than repeating old narratives about who is right or wrong in a given family situation. The ultimate aim is to protect young people from psychological distress by encouraging honest dialogue and shared problem solving. The focus is on practical steps that families can take together to foster secure, supportive environments where future parents feel empowered rather than overwhelmed by inherited tensions.
There is a contrasting note that sometimes appears in public discourse about family life. Recent media chatter recounts incidents from the entertainment industry that involve famous actors and public scrutiny of their appearances. These anecdotes do not reflect the broader dynamics at play in homes and communities across North America. The emphasis remains on how intergenerational experiences shape attitudes toward marriage and parenting, and how open communication can help rewrite the script for the next generation. The guiding principle is clear: trust, respect, and dialogue build stronger foundations than silence or coercion.
The discussion reflects a broader conversation about family dynamics and healthy relationships in contemporary life. The goal is to provide practical strategies that families can use to foster resilience and emotional well-being among young people weighing life decisions about marriage and parenthood. The perspective also highlights how conversations within homes can model responsible, compassionate choices and contribute to more stable, supportive communities over time.