Victoria Daineko stood by blogger Elena Blinovskaya, who was detained before trial in a Moscow facility. Reports from Sound confirmed the singer’s support during a difficult moment for Blinovskaya and her family.
Daineko clearly stated that she did not endorse Blinovskaya’s alleged fraudulent schemes. Yet she expressed sympathy for Blinovskaya as a mother, acknowledging the emotional strain of a case that keeps a parent away from their children. This distinction—disapproval of the tactics paired with compassion for the person behind the controversy—was underscored in Daineko’s public remarks.
In Daineko’s words, laws must be followed and taxes should be paid, yet the singer also emphasized a fundamental human concern: no child should be separated from a mother. The sentiment reflected a broader conversation about how families cope with legal proceedings and confinement, and it highlighted the personal side of a case that has drawn wide public attention.
The events unfolded on January 22 when Elena Blinovskaya was transported to pre-trial detention center No. 6, known as Pechatniki. The initial charges involved a substantial tax dispute, with an amount cited at 918 million rubles. While Blinovskaya was placed under house arrest, certain restrictions remained in place, including bans on internet and mobile communications, which are typical measures designed to prevent flight or further dissemination of information during an investigation.
According to the Moscow Public Monitoring Committee, chaired by Georgy Volkov, Blinovskaya was moved to a four-bed cell, sharing the space with two neighbors. The committee noted that Blinovskaya did not voice complaints about the conditions, suggesting a degree of acceptance or resignation to the routine of detention while the case proceeds through the court system.
By January 24, Blinovskaya’s legal team had filed several petitions aimed at securing meetings with close relatives. The petitions requested permission for regular visits and communications, arguing for the importance of maintaining family ties during the legal process. The review period typically spans three days, but in this instance there was no formal response to the defense requests, which effectively translated into an automatic rejection at that stage of the proceedings.
Earlier in the process, Blinovskaya had also faced a denial of a meeting with her husband, a development that drew additional attention to the personal hardships experienced by those awaiting resolution in high-profile cases. The pattern of detentions, house arrest, and restricted communication underscores how defendants and their families navigate the intersection of legal accountability and the everyday needs of loved ones during the pre-trial phase. The situation remains a focal point of discussion about due process, family integrity, and the humane treatment of individuals under investigation, regardless of the public controversies surrounding the alleged offenses.
Observers note that such cases often raise broader questions about the balance between state security interests and the rights of defendants to maintain contact with family members. While the legal process moves forward, the emotional and practical realities for Blinovskaya and her relatives persist, shaping public discourse on the impact of detention policies on families across Russia and beyond. As the case develops, stakeholders continue to monitor proceedings, seeking transparency and fairness while clarifying the responsibilities of both authorities and defense representatives in maintaining contact, advocacy, and access to counsel.