On a talk show named Is this normal, TV host Anfisa Chekhova brought up the topic of friendship between men and women, inviting sex psychologist Ekaterina Gavrilyuk to share insights. The discussion explored whether platonic bonds between sexes can survive without romance or sexual tension, a question that often fuels lively debate in media circles and among viewers across North America. Chekhova voiced skepticism about the idea that opposite-sex friendships can remain purely nonromantic, a stance Gavrilyuk challenged by presenting a broader view of human relationships and the nuances of attraction that can exist without immediate intimacy.
Gavrilyuk argued that a man and a woman can share time together, even in situations that might be labeled as intimate by outsiders, without there being any covert or overt romantic signal. The conversation touched on boundaries, context, and the complexity of friendships that cross gender lines. The sexologist explained that beliefs about such friendships are shaped by long-standing observations and personal experiences, rather than by a single moment or anecdote. In this exchange, she emphasized that it is possible for adults to engage in social interactions that test conventional norms without compromising personal values or causing relationship strain.
During a candid interview with URA.RU, Gavrilyuk spoke about her willingness to express her opinions openly. She clarified that there is no fear in sharing her point of view, and she noted that her stance had been developing over many years. The psychologist described a mindset that prioritizes honest dialogue and the idea that open discussion about relationships can lead to a healthier understanding for audiences, rather than a need to win an argument. In her view, broadcasting viewpoints to a broad audience is not inherently different from expressing them in a private chat, and the goal is to encourage thoughtful conversation rather than dictate what others should believe. This perspective aligns with a broader commitment to transparency and public education about human sexuality and interpersonal dynamics.
Chekhova, who is a well-known figure in the entertainment world, has shared in various interviews that her family life remains a priority even as her public career continues to evolve. She is the mother of Solomon, born in 2012, from her marriage to actor Guram Bablishvili. The couple divorced in 2017, and Chekhova has spoken frankly about the pressures of balancing professional duties with family responsibilities. She has described times when she felt overwhelmed by her role as a central engine of the home, a sentiment that resonates with many parents juggling demanding careers with parenthood. The ongoing conversation around her personal life often reflects broader themes about independence, parenting, and the evolving nature of celebrity relationships in the media age.
In January 2024, Chekhova revealed that she had entered into a new romance with a man who is 55 years old. She did not disclose the identity of the partner, noting only that the person is not connected to the entertainment industry. The revelation suggested a shift in her public narrative toward a relationship outside the world of show business, a detail that sparked curiosity among fans and media observers who follow her life closely. This candid disclosure illustrates the broader pattern of public figures sharing aspects of their private lives in ways that invite discussion about age, love, and celebrity culture.
Earlier discussions by Anfisa Chekhova addressed her reasons for dating people she encounters unexpectedly, rather than pursuing traditional social introductions or high-profile partners. Those remarks reflect a personal philosophy that relationships can develop in organic, unplanned ways, challenging common assumptions about how celebrities choose their partners. The evolving story around Chekhova underscores how public figures navigate personal choices within the glare of media scrutiny, while still seeking authentic connections and meaningful companionship. The broader audience can glean perspectives on romance, personal agency, and the often messy, imperfect reality of dating. This ongoing dialogue highlights the tension between private life and public perception that many public figures experience as they age and grow personally and professionally.