A report cited by Mediaite references an FBI document about an event in 2016 that involved Hollywood actor Brad Pitt during a flight and a dispute with his then wife, Angelina Jolie. The dispute reportedly occurred amid ongoing tensions between the couple, who would soon begin divorce proceedings.
According to the account, Pitt was allegedly intoxicated and directed harsh words toward Jolie. The country’s air space and airports fall under federal jurisdiction, which prompted an FBI inquiry into the matter. After a brief review, Pitt was not charged and the inquiry closed without further action.
From the FBI side, a spokesperson stated that after the United States Special Judiciary flight landed in Los Angeles with Pitt and their children, a background check was conducted and the investigation would not continue. This remark was reported as part of the standard follow up on the case.
During the same cycle of reports, court records surfaced suggesting that Jolie might be the plaintiff connected to a Freedom of Information Act request seeking more transparency about the investigation’s closure. The motion described a desire for clarity regarding the reasons the inquiry ended and the level of detail provided to the public.
Later statements from sources close to the matter indicated Jolie was identified in filings as the party involved in the FBI case. These updates contributed to ongoing public interest in how the incident was handled and what information remains accessible through official channels.
Recollections from Jolie describe an episode on the plane where she claimed Pitt appeared intoxicated and that she moved to protect their family by stepping away from the situation. Accounts described her actions as trying to calm the moment and deescalate potential consequences of the confrontation.
Subsequent reports claimed there was another argument during the same flight, with one side alleging Jolie sustained injuries. Pitt reportedly provided a photo of a bruised elbow to illustrate the impact of the event. Jolie also asserted that beer was spilled in a way that affected her during the incident.
In the aftermath, Pitt denied the allegations, and the couple proceeded to finalize their divorce. The case drew renewed attention to how high profile disputes on private or semi private travel are reviewed by federal investigators and how much information remains public when investigations conclude.
Experts note that such cases often hinge on a careful balance between protecting individuals’ privacy and providing sufficient transparency when public safety is a concern. When incidents involve prominent figures, media coverage can amplify questions about process, accountability, and the kinds of evidence that inform official determinations. The FBI’s role in reviewing incidents on aircraft is part of a broader framework that governs airline safety, behavior onboard, and the rights of passengers and crew to request intervention if a situation becomes disruptive.
Observers also point to the importance of FOIA requests in sheding light on previously closed investigations. They emphasize that while not every detail can be released, the process itself is designed to ensure a degree of accountability and openness about how decisions were reached. As this case continues to be discussed in public forums, it serves as a reminder that federal agencies sometimes respond to inquiries with summaries that reflect the scope of the inquiry rather than a full public dossier.