A Russian producer, Bari Alibasov, said to socialbites.ca that his lawsuit against the M.Video electronics chain lacks any real spark. The laptop he complained about because World Of Tanks ran slowly had to be buried, he claimed, as the dispute wore on without a clear resolution.
He described the situation as a string of dead ends. No one was willing to make definitive moves or offer a practical fix. Alibasov recounted making contact with several organizations, only to be met with the suggestion to set paperwork aside for a moment and focus on other steps. There appeared to be little genuine interest or will to address the problem, and he felt the entire process devolved into empty talk and delays. He noted that repeated attempts to communicate with M.Video yielded conversations that felt hollow, with phrases that sounded like echoing excuses rather than concrete commitments.
Since returning the laptop, Alibasov says he no longer plays World Of Tanks. The matter left him with a sense of loss and unresolved frustration. He explained that the device was returned without compensation, and though he owns multiple computers, the specific laptop in question seems to be irretrievably gone in his view.
In the dispute, representatives from the M.Video network said that technicians were prepared to work with the artist on connecting the gear, optimizing game settings, and fine-tuning internet access. They even offered computer literacy guidance, though Alibasov’s assistant indicated that the producer did not need formal training and could handle the setup himself. The situation progressed to a court session in the region, where the case drew attention from local observers and the industry. The full judicial code text related to the case had not been published at that time, leaving some questions unanswered as to the exact legal posture and next steps.
Earlier remarks from Alibasov touched on personal connections and family history. He disclosed that he had received some training from the grandson of his former wife, actress Lydia Fedoseeva-Shukshina, adding another layer to the Fabric of his personal narrative as he navigated the tech challenge and the ensuing legal process. The broader context includes a well-known music producer branding and public persona intersecting with consumer technology and retail service experiences, a blend that can complicate how such disputes are perceived by fans and the general public alike.
Overall, the episode illustrates the friction that can occur when consumer electronics fail to meet expectations and public figures engage with service providers. It also highlights the sometimes sluggish pace of court actions and the challenge of obtaining a timely resolution in cases that sit at the crossroads of personal equipment, brand loyalty, and professional obligations. The story continues to unfold as parties weigh their options and await further developments, with both sides signaling a willingness to discuss practical remedies while navigating the constraints of the legal framework and the practical realities of digital gaming and hardware maintenance.