The legal dispute involving Wildberries founder Tatyana Bakalchuk and her husband, Vladislav Bakalchuk, reached the Moscow Savyolovsky District Court. The case was reported by the Telegram channel Courts of general jurisdiction of the city of Moscow. The court confirmed receipt of a claim submitted by Tatyana Bakalchuk, described as arising from family law relations, and noted the subject matter of the filing as matters connected to the couple’s private life rather than commercial disputes between the business entities alone. The subsequent filings indicated that Vladislav Bakalchuk had also initiated a claim against his wife. The parties publicly acknowledged these proceedings through posts on social networks. The sequence of events highlights the intersection of personal relations and business interests within one of Russia’s largest online marketplaces.
In the evolving corporate landscape surrounding Wildberries, there were reports that the business could undergo organizational shifts involving its legal structure. Specifically, discussions referenced a transfer of a domain name to the legal entity RVB LLC, which has been described as a partner company of the marketplace and the Russ group. These changes were presented as part of broader corporate realignments and were discussed in public forums as the platform navigated restructuring.
On July 23, Vladislav Bakalchuk told Ramzan Kadyrov, the president of Chechnya, that the marketplace had “fallen into the hands of shameless raiders” following its merger with Russ Outdoor, an outdoor advertising operator. Tatyana Bakalchuk countered these claims, stating that there was no raider takeover. She attributed the changes in the company’s structure to the consequences of her divorce from her husband, framing the corporate transitions as strategic moves rather than hostile takeovers. This clarification aimed to distinguish private family dynamics from the operational realities of the business.
Observers note that such episodes illustrate how personal and legal developments can influence public perception of a major e-commerce platform. While the market watches for further confirmations of any structural adjustments, the company has continued to emphasize stability and continuity for its customers and partners. The public narrative around these events underscores the sensitivity of corporate governance when personal relationships intersect with large-scale business operations.
As the situation develops, market participants and analysts are likely to monitor court actions and corporate disclosures for guidance on leadership, control, and strategy at Wildberries. The proceedings and subsequent statements offer a window into how family-law matters can intersect with corporate governance in high-profile, fast-growing enterprises. The ongoing dialogue between stakeholders remains a focal point in understanding the company’s future trajectory and its ability to maintain momentum in a competitive marketplace.
Notes from the public‑facing discussions emphasize the distinction between legitimate corporate management changes and allegations of hostile takeovers. By keeping stakeholder communication clear, Wildberries aims to preserve trust among customers, vendors, and investors while navigating a period that blends personal matters with business strategy. The unfolding events continue to shape the narrative around one of Russia’s most notable e-commerce platforms and its leadership team.