A Moscow Arbitration Court decision ordered Banda LLC to repay more than 10 million rubles to an entrepreneur from Kalmykia, Yulia Milchenko. The creditor’s claim arose from a paid service agreement, specifying a principal debt of 9.9 million rubles and approximately 120 thousand rubles in interest. The court fully granted the claim, securing the recovery of the specified amounts and validating the contractual obligation. The ruling illustrates how arbitration courts in Russia’s capital region enforce debt settlements on service contracts when a business does not meet its financial commitments, and it underscores the effectiveness of creditor claims in such disputes.
Hasanov is described as the founder of four companies. Banda LLC concentrates on consulting and information services, Hyde LLC offers hairdressing and beauty salon services, Red Box Trading LLC operates a catering business, and Banda Foods LLC also runs a catering enterprise that is currently in liquidation. At present, Hasanov has withdrawn from membership in all four firms. The business portfolio shows a range of ventures tied to a single individual, with the liquidation of the food-related companies signaling a winding down of several projects while the information and service side remains a focal point in the record.
In August, couriers tied to Hasanov’s closed sushi restaurant filed a lawsuit claiming more than half a million rubles. The action points to unsettled financial obligations connected to the former restaurant operations and highlights ongoing legal tension around Hasanov’s business interests linked to that enterprise.
Earlier accounts describe Hasanov dealing with a Moscow apartment matter connected to tax authorities. A Moscow property associated with him appeared in proceedings involving a payment of 145 million rubles to the Federal Tax Service, illustrating the scale of tax-related issues tied to his real estate holdings and related entities.
Taken together, these developments depict a businessman with multiple ventures facing financial claims within Russia’s capital. The court’s handling of debt recovery and the ongoing lawsuits reflect persistent creditor activity across this network of companies. The case showcases how creditors pursue balances and interest through arbitration processes while corporate structures undergo restructuring and dissolution in a major market like Moscow, offering broader lessons about contract enforcement and business risk for investors and stakeholders connected to similar setups across North America.