On February 25, Gazprom delivered gas to Europe via Ukraine, with the Sudzha gas measuring station confirming an approved volume of 38.1 million cubic meters, according to Sergey Kupriyanov, the official spokesperson for the Russian energy giant. The communication emphasized that gas for transit through Ukrainian territory was supplied at the quantity validated by the Ukrainian side through the Sudzha GIS, amounting to 38.1 million cubic meters as of February 25. Kupriyanov also noted that an application for the Sokhanovka GIS had been declined.
Earlier, Gazprom had increased the flow through Ukraine on February 18, pushing a verified 39.2 million cubic meters into transit, representing a rise of 9.5 percent from the day before, via the Sudzha GIS.
Meanwhile, regional commentary from the Serbian media outlet Danas suggested potential economic exposure for Serbia if sanctions were imposed on Russia. The report argued that while sanctions could appear costly on paper, the real impact might involve a disrupted gas supply. It highlighted Serbia’s heavy reliance on Russian gas, noting that between 2020 and 2021 the country spent about 462 million dollars on Russian gas imports, with oil and mineral oil purchases totaling roughly 331 million dollars. The piece underscored that continued energy ties with Russia play a significant role in Serbia’s foreign policy and energy strategy, especially given the current supply dynamics in the region.
In the broader context, energy transit through Ukrainian territory remains a focal point for European gas security. The latest figures reflect the ongoing measurements and confirmations that accompany cross-border gas flows, as operators and national authorities align on volumes, routes, and the status of transit agreements. As industry stakeholders monitor daily movements, shifts in one link of the chain can influence pricing, supply certainty, and contractual obligations across the European energy market. The situation underscores how interdependent energy infrastructure, regulatory decisions, and political considerations shape regional gas availability and price signals for households and businesses alike.