The Bank of Russia has announced a six‑month window to review citizens’ cryptocurrency transactions, a move described by the organizer of the financial market research program. The aim is to build a clearer picture of how digital assets are used by individuals as part of ongoing efforts to monitor financial activity and protect the integrity of cross-border payments. The plan assigns a defined period during which banks will supply data, enabling the central bank to observe current patterns, identify emerging trends, and assess potential risks to financial stability. The regulator stresses that this effort is informational in nature, intended to inform policy decisions and strengthen oversight rather than to impose immediate new rules. As cryptocurrency markets evolve rapidly, authorities want better visibility into how digital assets flow through the broader economy and the international payments system.
Between the fourth quarter of 2024 and the first quarter of 2025, nineteen credit institutions will provide the Central Bank with information about cross-border transfers involving the purchase and sale of digital assets. The participants include MTS Bank, Raiffeisenbank, Citibank, Soyuz Bank, UniCredit Bank, and other lenders across the state and private sectors. The data to be shared covers the keys used to move funds, the payment systems that process the transfers, the counterparties involved, and the country codes associated with each transaction. By gathering these details, the central bank aims to map how Russians are sending money abroad to buy or sell crypto assets, and to understand the scale of activity that crosses international borders. The process emphasizes cooperation across the banking sector and signals a coordinated approach to monitoring crypto flows within Russia’s financial system.
The central objective of data collection is to identify and quantify the volume of crypto asset transactions within the overall flow of international money transfers from residents. Regulators will request information about the banks’ transfer methods, the payment systems used, the parties to the transactions, and the destination country codes. This information helps authorities evaluate exposure, assess compliance with anti‑money laundering frameworks, and refine risk controls across the banking network. While the data set is designed to capture meaningful indicators, the exact interpretation must account for the complexity of crypto markets, including mixed modes of settlement and the use of multiple channels for asset exchange. Not all crypto activity occurs on centralized platforms, and some exchanges and wallets operate outside traditional banking rails, which adds nuance to the analysis.
Banks identify cryptocurrency transactions by looking at the codes attached to transfers and by cross‑checking counterparty data, especially when funds are sent to digital asset exchanges. However, analysts caution that the results may not be perfectly accurate. Not all crypto activity takes place on centralized platforms, and decentralized methods, peer‑to‑peer transfers, and private custodial services can escape straightforward labeling. The gap between detected activity and actual trading flows means that any early findings should be treated as indicative rather than definitive. Still, the data collection program represents a significant effort to bring crypto activity into the purview of traditional financial supervision.
Even in the absence of a formal domestic framework, cryptocurrencies remain widely used within Russia. The country ranked seventh globally in 2024 for crypto asset adoption, according to Shard in 2024, reflecting broad participation from individuals and businesses alike. Industry trackers report that crypto turnover reached about 2.3 trillion rubles in the first half of 2024, illustrating substantial use cases ranging from remittances to speculative trading and service payments. These realities underscore why regulators are keen to observe how crypto activity intersects with regular money movement and international settlement. The combination of high engagement and evolving market structures keeps policy debates active as officials weigh potential safeguards without stifling innovation.
Despite the lack of a clear, comprehensive regulation, the regulator has not ruled out crypto activity altogether; instead, attention remains on how crypto can operate within a controlled framework. Authorities have signaled that domestic use of cryptocurrencies does not have formal authorization at present, while at the same time exploring and preparing cross-border crypto payment experiments that could begin toward the end of 2024. In parallel, work on the Digital Ruble continues, with ongoing discussions about timing and scope for broader deployment. These efforts reflect a cautious approach that seeks to balance user access and financial integrity, gradually integrating digital currency tools into Russia’s international payments landscape while preserving traditional safeguards.
In sum, the Bank of Russia’s data gathering initiative signals a step toward deeper visibility into how Russians interact with digital assets in global transfers. By coordinating information from multiple banks and examining cross-border flows, regulators aim to inform policy choices, improve oversight, and prepare the ground for potential pilots. At the same time, uncertainty about regulation and the evolving Digital Ruble project means that the crypto ecosystem in Russia remains dynamic and closely watched. Observers will be watching how this data translates into concrete rules, consumer protections, and practical options for international crypto settlement in the years ahead.