In Ankara, a resource from TASS reported that Turkish and Russian authorities are expected to coordinate a practical path to resolve tensions around Russian airlines using Turkish airports that also host fleets from American manufacturers like Boeing.
Havaş, a Turkish firm known for aircraft maintenance and ground services, has warned that the continuation of cooperation with Aeroflot could be at risk if current arrangements change. The notice reflects the delicate balance struck between aviation actors and regulators in cross-border operations, where operational continuity hinges on bilateral diplomacy as much as on market demand.
One TASS interlocutor urged caution about overreacting to the issue before all details are known. The official emphasized that Turkish and Russian authorities routinely work through bilateral concerns and are prepared to intervene when necessary to keep air services flowing smoothly between the two nations. This tempered view underscores the practical nature of crisis management in international aviation, where plans can adapt quickly to new information.
That same source suggested that Havaş’s communication may be tied to forthcoming talks between the Russian and Turkish aviation authorities, specifically regarding flight quotas and capacity allocations between the two countries. The negotiations are expected to address how many flights each side can schedule, a critical factor for airlines operating on joint routes and for maintaining predictable schedules for passengers and freight.
Havaş operates aircraft services at about 90 airports across 29 countries, with a focus on hubs in Turkey including Istanbul, Ankara, and Antalya, among many others. In a formal letter from the company’s leadership, Mete Erna, it was noted that a large share of the Russian airline fleet—over 170 aircraft—along with seven Belarusian and four Iranian aircraft, could be candidates for decommissioning or retirement depending on the evolving regulatory and market circumstances. This potential shift would have implications for fleet planning, maintenance workflows, and the broader regional aviation ecosystem as carriers adjust to changes in traffic rights, airspace access, and airport services contracts. In those contexts, service providers and regulators alike are assessing how to preserve safety, reliability, and economic efficiency in the face of geopolitical and market pressures. The overall tone from industry observers remains pragmatic: while risk exists, the trajectory of talks and the readiness of authorities to negotiate concrete quotas will shape outcomes for carriers, airports, and service partners in both countries. The emphasis is on collaborative problem-solving that prioritizes secure operations and orderly capacity management, rather than on halting services outright. At stake are not just the mechanics of flight schedules, but the confidence of passengers and the continuity of supply chains that rely on dependable air transport in and out of the region. Primary considerations include fleet utilization, maintenance pipelines, and the long-term strategic alignment of Turkish airport infrastructure with Russian, Belarusian, and Iranian carrier activity, all within the bounds of international aviation rules and sanctions regimes as they evolve. As talks proceed, observers will be watching for concrete commitments on quotas, service levels, and the practical steps needed to sustain a robust and safe aviation corridor between Turkey and Russia, with the broader aim of stabilizing regional air travel and supporting the economies that depend on it. The situation remains dynamic, with the expectation that constructive dialogue will yield workable solutions for all stakeholders involved, including airline operators, ground handling providers, and airport authorities that together manage the day-to-day realities of international flight operations. These developments are being monitored by aviation professionals around the world, who recognize that successful outcomes will hinge on transparent negotiations, timely data sharing, and a shared commitment to keeping airports functioning as reliable gateways for people and goods. Citations: TASS on bilateral aviation discussions and industry responses.