An official statement from the press service of the Federal Air Transport Agency confirms there is no reason to withhold the Sukhoi Superjet 100 from service. The agency stresses that the current information does not point to any fault in the aircraft design and that continuing operations remain permissible while investigators work. This stance reflects a measured approach to safety, balancing immediate operational needs with a careful, fact-based review of the events tied to the Antalya incident. In these circumstances, authorities emphasize that policy decisions about aircraft usage are not made on preliminary signals but on solid, objective assessment results from a formal inquiry.
The agency also addressed the engine fire aboard the Superjet 100 in Antalya, noting that preliminary data do not implicate the aircraft’s design or structure. Officials stressed that attributing causes requires a complete, rigorous investigation that considers multiple factors. The emphasis is on an independent review carried out by qualified investigators, with findings expected to provide a clear, evidence-based picture of what occurred and why.
Officials underscored that only an objective and comprehensive investigation will uncover the true causes of the incident. This process involves detailed analysis of flight data, maintenance records, and environmental conditions, alongside evidence gathered from the aircraft and the scene. The aim is to reach conclusions that are defensible, transparent, and useful for future safety improvements. In parallel with that work, the authorities noted that a prior objection regarding the condition of a damaged Antalya aircraft from early 2024 was reviewed, and the aircraft was found to meet all required standards at the time of inspection. This review is part of a broader due diligence to ensure ongoing airworthiness and compliance with regulatory requirements.
The incident occurred on the evening of November 24 when a Sukhoi Superjet 100 was operating a flight from Sochi to Antalya. On board were 89 passengers and 6 crew members; there were no injuries reported among them. In describing the development, the United Aircraft Corporation indicated that the fuel leak and the subsequent fire could have stemmed from a severe impact with the runway surface from the side rather than from a fault within the aircraft’s systems. The comment reflects a cautious assessment as investigators gather and verify evidence from multiple angles. This perspective does not establish a final cause but points to a plausible scenario that investigators will examine alongside other possibilities.
Earlier reports about the Antalya fire noted that initial results from the investigation were made available, with authorities outlining the first observations and continuing the process of collecting data. Investigators are expected to examine engines, fuel lines, electrical systems, and the integrity of the airframe, along with environmental and operational factors that could have contributed to the incident. The ongoing inquiry remains the definitive source for determining causes and for recommending steps to prevent recurrence, including potential adjustments to maintenance procedures or operational controls when warranted.
In aviation practice, such inquiries are comprehensive and methodical, often spanning multiple agencies and timelines. Assessments typically involve analyzing flight data recorders where available, inspecting the airframe and powerplant components, reviewing maintenance histories, and evaluating ground handling and runway conditions at the time of the event. The outcome of the Antalya case will be measured not only by the final cause but also by the actionable safety measures that may follow. Public confidence relies on demonstrated transparency, disciplined methodology, and timely communication of outcomes that meaningfully inform operators, regulators, and the flying public about safety improvements and risk mitigation.
Throughout the process, the focus remains squarely on protecting passengers and crew while preserving the integrity of the investigation. The SSJ-100 has a long operational history across various markets, and authorities are mindful that the aviation system functions effectively only when questions are answered with rigor and candor. The overall objective is to ensure that there are no avoidable gaps in safety, that maintenance practices stay up to date, and that any lessons learned are promptly shared with the broader aviation community to reduce risk in similar scenarios in the future.