State Duma deputy Sultan Khamzaev has petitioned Roskomnadzor to curb the spread of slang terms by automakers and digital aggregators, drawing on a report from the Telegram channel Bloody Woman. The appeal signals a push to regulate language used in public channels and advertising associated with vehicles and automotive services. In parliamentary circles, there is growing concern that casual phrasing may shape public perception and, in some cases, influence how regulatory messages are received by everyday drivers and industry workers alike.
According to a representative from the United Russia faction, certain colloquialisms such as the term “speed bump” could be deemed unlawful or used provocatively, potentially disparaging employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The discussion points to a broader tension between informal speech and the need for respectful, professional communication in governmental and safety-critical contexts. Observers note that slang in official or semi-official materials can blur accountability, complicate enforcement of road safety rules, and create misunderstandings among motorists who rely on clear directions and warnings when operating a vehicle on public roads.
In his remarks, the deputy urged Roskomnadzor to clarify the agency’s official stance and to consider a formal prohibition on using slang terms in public communications. He also suggested acknowledging that expressions such as “speed bump” might be undesirable when used in media and on internet portals, especially in content that reaches a broad audience. The aim appears to be a more uniform linguistic standard across media and public portals, reducing the risk of misinterpretation or the spread of phrases that could be perceived as disrespectful or misleading by road users and law enforcement officers alike.
Earlier, the Deputy Chairman of the State Duma, Vladislav Davankov, forwarded a separate initiative to the government. The draft legislation proposes waiving fines for drivers who forget their driver’s license, while introducing a requirement to carry documents proving vehicle foreign registration, foreign driving privileges, and proof of compulsory liability insurance. This proposal responds to gaps in the current system where foreign-registered vehicles and licenses may not be easily verifiable in domestic databases, creating challenges for police checks and insurance verification. Critics argue that the absence of complete information in the GIS database can hinder the effective enforcement of traffic laws and the appropriate application of penalties when violations occur with foreign documentation.
Supporters of the bill contend that streamlining the process for drivers with foreign registrations would reduce unnecessary penalties and friction for legitimate travelers, while still maintaining essential protections, such as ensuring valid insurance and proper licensing. They emphasize the importance of aligning administrative procedures with the realities of cross-border mobility and the growing use of international vehicle registries. Opponents, however, caution that any loosening of verification requirements must be balanced with rigorous mechanisms to confirm authenticity, prevent fraud, and maintain public safety on the road. The dialogue on this topic reflects a broader effort to modernize traffic management systems and digital records to better reflect how people travel today, including those who operate vehicles registered outside the country of residence.
In related developments, questions persist about how foreign driving credentials are handled within the geographic information system and the broader regulatory framework. The lack of real-time visibility into foreign license status can complicate checks during routine stops and at border controls, and it raises concerns about liability, compliance, and the integrity of traffic data. Proponents argue that improved data interoperability between domestic and international registries could enhance road safety by enabling more accurate verification of driver qualifications and insurance coverage. Critics warn against overreliance on digital databases without robust safeguards against data mismatches and privacy concerns. The ongoing parliamentary debate highlights a push to align administrative practices with the realities of a globally interconnected transport system, while ensuring that law enforcement and citizens alike have confidence in the accuracy and fairness of enforcement actions.