Reassessing Rules for Electric Scooters and Personal Mobility Devices
In many regions, the existing rules governing electric scooters and other personal mobility vehicles (SIM) are under review. Officials are discussing whether the current category M should be expanded or a new category created to provide clearer guidance for users and authorities. The conversation has been highlighted in official briefings, where representatives note that a broader framework could help citizens operate more powerful SIMs responsibly while maintaining safety on streets and in shared spaces.
One proposal involves adjusting the eligibility thresholds for the M category. While the category currently serves as a baseline for operators, several voices argue that lowering age requirements could enable younger riders to engage with these technologies under structured safety programs. The aim is to balance access with training so that younger users learn to handle electric scooters, electric bicycles, electric wheels, hoverboards, and similar devices in a controlled manner. Advocates emphasize that appropriate training is essential to reduce the risk of accidents and injuries as these tools become more commonplace in daily life.
Another set of recommendations focuses on the speed limits and riding environments for SIMs. There is a discussion about whether maximum speeds should be capped to prevent dangerous interactions with pedestrians and motorized traffic. In some technical assessments, experts have suggested a reasonable speed target that would still allow convenient city travel while encouraging safer riding behavior. The overarching idea is to create a predictable operating environment that helps drivers, pedestrians, and riders share urban spaces more harmoniously.
Industry and policy specialists also weigh in on where these devices should be used most safely. Some analysts argue that sidewalks, bike lanes, and certain low-speed corridors offer the most appropriate settings for SIM use, with clear rules that minimize conflicts with other road users. Others point out that urban infrastructure must evolve to accommodate new mobility options, including dedicated lanes and clearer signage, to ensure that all travelers—whether on foot, in a car, or on a scooter—can move efficiently and safely.
Historically, policies around electric mobility have varied by city and country, reflecting different urban layouts, traffic densities, and public safety priorities. In some Western cities, authorities have experimented with strict prohibitions or stringent licensing schemes, while others have pursued more permissive approaches aimed at encouraging sustainable travel and reducing car dependency. The current discourse centers on finding a balanced framework that supports innovation while maintaining high safety standards for the public. Compliance training, practical demonstrations, and clear instructional materials are often cited as essential components of any effective policy package for SIM users, especially for younger riders or newcomers to electric mobility.
Experts also acknowledge the importance of ongoing monitoring and review. Mobility patterns shift as technology evolves and as cities adapt to changing transportation needs. Regular assessments can help policymakers adjust age thresholds, speed limits, and use-case restrictions in response to real-world data and incidents. The goal is to achieve a flexible, evidence-based system that remains aligned with public safety goals and urban mobility objectives.
In this broader context, authorities emphasize that any modifications to SIM regulations should be accompanied by public education campaigns. These campaigns would highlight safe riding practices, the responsibilities of operators, and the importance of obeying traffic rules. For cities considering changes to mobility policies, the consensus is clear: safety must be the cornerstone, supported by clear guidelines, robust training, and a transparent mechanism for updating regulations as conditions evolve. Citations from policy committees and municipal transport bodies underline that well-structured rules can facilitate wider adoption of electric mobility while protecting pedestrians and other road users.