In Heilongjiang province, a group of taxi drivers gathered in front of a Geely showroom to question the advertised fuel consumption of a new model. The drivers argued that the stated efficiency figures were inaccurate and demanded refunds and compensation. The demonstrations highlighted concerns about how mileage data is presented to fleets and individual buyers alike, with the drivers asserting that the car’s real-world performance diverges from the advertised numbers. Local observers noted that the action was spurred by a broader dissatisfaction among commercial operators who rely on precise fuel economy to manage operating costs and fares. The dispute is running parallel to broader consumer protection scrutiny over automotive marketing claims, and the incident was reported by Auto Home as a catalyst for further official review.
Specifically, the rally centered on the Emgrand L Thor Hi·P hybrid taxi, a model equipped with a 1.5-liter gasoline engine paired with an electric motor and a traction battery. Demonstrators carried banners demanding refunds and compensation, challenging the claimed electric range and fuel efficiency at the advertised levels. Participants contended that the electric traction range does not exceed 30 kilometers when the vehicle is operating under the conditions used to determine the official consumption figure of the car. The dispute underscores the tension between marketing disclosures and actual performance in fleet operations, where even slight deviations in efficiency can have a meaningful financial impact over the lifetime of a taxi lease or purchase.
According to official information, the hybrid configuration combines a 1.5-liter gasoline engine with an integrated electric motor and a traction battery. The manufacturer’s data list a fuel consumption rate of about 3.8 liters per 100 kilometers under standardized testing. Proponents of the phrasing argue that such numbers reflect laboratory testing rather than real-world driving, a distinction that is of particular importance to taxi operators who log hundreds of kilometers each day. The case has drawn attention to how government agencies and consumer protection bodies evaluate and verify fleet claims, and it illustrates the ongoing need for transparent, verifiable efficiency metrics to support responsible fleet budgeting and operations. The developments were captured in reports by Auto Home and followed by industry analysts who emphasize accountability in vehicle marketing.
Earlier reports from Shanghai described a separate incident involving a driver of a BYD electric vehicle during a road incident, with multiple claims related to interactions with another brand, Tesla. Observers note that urban traffic disputes involving electric vehicles can quickly escalate into high-profile stories, reflecting broader conversations about safety, charging infrastructure, and the reliability of electric powertrains in commercial fleets. The episodes together highlight how electric and hybrid models are increasingly tested not only on highways and test tracks but in the daily realities of city streets and taxi operations. As the market evolves, drivers, dealers, and regulators are paying closer attention to how efficiency data is produced, presented, and perceived by those who rely on it most: fleet owners and ride-hailing drivers. The coverage remains consistent with industry commentary, which stresses that clear, consistent, and verifiable information benefits all parties involved, including customers seeking predictable operating costs and operators aiming for stable service pricing. The situation continues to be monitored by automotive media outlets and consumer advocates alike, with emphasis on fairness and accuracy in marketing disclosures.