The State Duma has moved a step forward in reforming vehicle registration rules by approving in the first reading a bill that removes the obligation to present a compulsory motor liability insurance policy in order to register a vehicle. This change broadens the set of required documents and reflects a shift in how ownership transitions are documented within the registration system. The proposal clarifies that changes in ownership or registration do not automatically compel the owner to keep the vehicle in regular operation, and it acknowledges that a vehicle might be held for a period without active use without triggering an automatic registration requirement. These adjustments aim to streamline processes for buyers and sellers while preserving the core responsibility to address liability risks associated with vehicle operation. The legislative move signifies a deliberate reexamination of the balance between straightforward administrative procedures and the safeguards that drive responsible vehicle ownership.
The bill, originally introduced earlier in the year, targets the obligation to present a compulsory traffic insurance policy when a vehicle changes hands. The explanatory note accompanying the bill argues that registration alone should not create a burden that compels immediate use of the vehicle or imposes a presumption of ongoing operation. It emphasizes that a transfer of ownership involves documentation that confirms legal transfer rather than a guarantee of immediate or continuous vehicle use. In practice, this means the registration framework could permit a smoother transfer process that focuses on proof of ownership and legal rights rather than requiring proof of active insurance at the moment of transfer. This approach seeks to align registration requirements with real-world ownership activities, reducing friction for individuals completing a sale or transfer.
Under the current compulsory insurance regime, vehicle owners are required to insure the risk of liability before registering to change the vehicle’s owner, with a window of up to ten days from the purchase date to secure coverage. The proposed changes would alter how and when insurance is presented during the registration workflow, potentially decoupling immediate insurance presentation from the act of changing ownership. The central idea is to ensure that liability protection remains in place, while giving owners the flexibility to complete formalities without being constrained by the insurance requirement at the exact moment of registration. This could reduce delays for buyers and sellers who are navigating title transfers, lease terminations, or other ownership transitions, especially in markets where ownership records can take time to verify.
As the bill stands, a newly documented owner seeking to register a vehicle, whether through purchase, rental, or ownership transfer, would need to assemble a set of documents that attests to ownership and the vehicle’s legal status. The list includes the new owner’s passport, the vehicle registration certificate and the vehicle passport, a document that verifies ownership or rental arrangements, the compulsory motor liability insurance policy, a power of attorney if the applicant is acting on someone else’s behalf, and a valid diagnostic card for vehicles that are older than four years. The combination of documents is designed to establish clear proof of ownership and to verify that the vehicle meets safety and regulatory requirements before the registration record is updated. This approach helps prevent fraudulent transfers and ensures that registration reflects true, legal ownership at the moment of change.
While the proposed policy shifts certain requirements, it also raises practical questions about how registration offices will verify ownership, ensure liability coverage eventually, and manage scenarios such as sales that occur outside standard marketplaces or complex rental agreements. Practitioners and regulators will likely explore complementary safeguards to avoid gaps during transitions, particularly in cases where a vehicle is not immediately put back into service or when ownership changes hands across different jurisdictions. The policy’s success will depend on clear guidance for officers, consistent documentation practices, and the establishment of robust mechanisms to enforce liability protection without creating unnecessary bottlenecks in the transfer process. In real-world terms, these reforms could translate into faster, more efficient transfers, reduced administrative overhead, and greater clarity for buyers who might be entering a transfer with varied insurance timelines.
The practical outcome of these adjustments is that there is a stronger emphasis on verified ownership and regulatory compliance while allowing temporary flexibility around insurance presentation during the registration event. As the legislative process continues, stakeholders will watch closely to see how the balance between administrative efficiency and liability protection is maintained. The ultimate goal is to create a streamlined, transparent registration environment that supports legitimate ownership changes without compromising safety or financial accountability. When fully implemented, the new rules could simplify the administrative workflow for vehicle transactions and reduce delays that commonly accompany ownership transfers, all while maintaining the essential safeguards that protect road users and insurers alike.