In Krasnoyarsk, a fire broke out at the night hours in the building housing the city’s traffic police division, and the blaze quickly drew attention from residents who witnessed the glow and smoke seeping through the windows. Local observers and a Telegram channel reported that firefighters battled the flames for several hours while trying to prevent the fire from spreading to adjacent rooms and offices. The incident appeared to be serious, with emergency crews racing against time to contain the damage and safeguard critical equipment and records that might have been located inside the structure.
The fire was first noticed around two thirty in the morning at the traffic police REO point on Maerchak Street, a facility tied to the operational vehicle fleet used by the force. Early reports suggested that the ignition originated from cables behind a cabinet within one of the regional traffic office rooms. Investigators understandably sought to verify this version by examining electrical panels, wiring routes, and any signs of a short circuit or faulty insulation that could have sparked the initial blaze. As the investigation progressed, authorities emphasized a methodical approach to determine whether the origin lay in electrical infrastructure or in another external factor that might have contributed to the rapid spread of flames.
The alarm system at the site did not sound as the fire began to take hold, which complicated early detection and initial response. The situation only became apparent when thick smoke and flames started to shoot out of the windows, underscoring how crucial timely detection is in such facilities where sensitive documents, communication devices, and fleet paperwork are stored. Firefighting units arrived promptly, but the intensity of the flames meant that control over the fire required a sustained and coordinated effort. After several hours of intense effort, the entire building was consumed by fire, leaving little behind and prompting a thorough check for any surviving items that could be recovered or safely documented for investigative purposes.
Despite the severity of the incident, no injuries were reported among personnel or residents nearby, which officials described as a fortunate development given the potential hazards associated with fires in administrative buildings that house vehicles, fuel systems, and electronic equipment. The department confirmed that essential machinery and documents may have suffered irreparable loss, while some operational assets possibly escaped damage due to protective measures or the fire’s direction. In the aftermath, authorities pledged to conduct a complete inventory of the lost assets and to review safety protocols, electrical systems, and building safeguards to prevent a recurrence in the future while ensuring continuity of police operations in the region.
Earlier, in Kirov, a separate blaze had reportedly sweep through a garage area used for patrol cars, the kind of incident that risked disrupting daily policing routines. It followed a moment when the police chief paused during a break outdoors and then, upon returning to the work area, encountered flames that rapidly engulfed the garage. The fire spread to three service vehicles stationed inside — two Skoda models and a UAZ Patriot — and those vehicles were entirely burned. Attempts by the chief to douse the flames on site were unsuccessful, and the scene highlighted how quickly a small spark in a closed space can escalate into major vehicle loss, particularly when fuel systems and spare parts are in close proximity. The event served as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities faced by fleets stationed in low-visibility, enclosed areas and the need for rapid, organized fire response to minimize damage to critical patrol assets.
In another troubling development, authorities investigated a separate arson case involving a deputy of the Leningrad region, Artem Fedorov, whose car was found to be set ablaze during the night in Nikolskoye. The vehicle, reported as completely destroyed, was found near the scene with a container or bottle nearby that suggested a flammable liquid may have been involved. Investigators treated this incident as potentially connected to broader acts of sabotage or intimidation directed at public officials, and they pursued a full forensic examination to identify a motive and determine whether the fire was linked to any ongoing investigations or political tensions in the area. As the case unfolded, officials urged residents to report any suspicious activity and cooperated with law enforcement to piece together the timeline of events and potential suspects.