In a discussion with auto expert Igor Morzharetto RT, insights were shared on how to shield a vehicle from theft and the best practices that today’s drivers can implement. Morzharetto explained that several cars come with a simplified security package, and owners may need to add extra layers of protection to stay ahead of opportunistic thieves. This approach aligns with the needs of drivers across Canada and the United States, where theft prevention is a top concern for many households and fleet operators alike.
The expert emphasized that if a vehicle already has an immobilizer paired with an alarm system, the decision to upgrade rests with the owner. Determining whether to add a stronger alarm, a more sensitive siren, or a separate immobilizing module depends on the vehicle model, local crime patterns, and the owner’s risk tolerance. For those in higher-risk areas, a layered approach can make a difference by increasing the time a thief spends trying to bypass protections, reducing the likelihood of a successful break-in.
Morzharetto also reminded readers that many insurance providers require the installation of a satellite tracking system for premium or high-value vehicles. This tool not only aids recovery but can also influence premium pricing and claims outcomes. In practical terms, placing the car in a secure garage or a guarded parking facility adds another meaningful layer of security and often aligns with insurance incentives, roadside support programs, and corporate fleet policies. These measures collectively create a robust defense against opportunistic theft, especially for vehicles kept in urban centers or at commercial locations where the risk is higher.
The discussion also touched on the resurgence of mechanical anti-theft devices. Traditional measures, once viewed as relics of the automotive security scene, have re-entered the market with renewed relevance. Devices that physically restrict movement, such as locking mechanisms integrated into key components, can complicate theft attempts and deter less experienced intruders. Morzharetto noted that a strategy combining mechanical barriers with electronic systems tends to yield the strongest overall protection, particularly in environments where thieves may adapt quickly to newer digital defenses.
Examples of varied locking strategies include devices that engage with the gas pedal, hood, or steering wheel. While these methods may not intimidate a highly determined thief, they can deter opportunists who rely on speed and ease of access. The key takeaway is that any additional obstacle raises the effort and risk for a would-be thief, increasing the chance that the vehicle remains secure until the owner returns. The expert also highlighted the importance of consistent use and proper maintenance of these devices to ensure reliability when it matters most.
As a broader note, it has been observed that vehicle theft dynamics differ by region and market. In certain areas, specific models can attract more attention in the secondary parts market, which in turn influences the choices car owners make around security upgrades. The discussion with Morzharetto underscores the value of tailoring protection strategies to the vehicle, its location, and the owner’s routine. In addition to physical measures, drivers should stay informed about best practices, such as parking in well-lit areas, enabling all available security features, and keeping a spare key out of sight to avoid duplication risks. These general guidelines help form a practical, well-rounded security plan that complements the technologies discussed above. The overarching idea is simple: stronger, layered security reduces risk and supports quicker recovery if misfortune strikes.