Sebastian Beccacece arrived in Spain only a short time ago, signing off responsibilities with Elche CF last April. During that stretch he was accompanied by several assistants, while the author followed many matches across Spain’s top two divisions, the First and Second Leagues, to observe how teams deploy different approaches and how coaches adapt under pressure.
Among the teams that hold a personal fascination for the writer is Andorra, led by Eder Sarabia. Interestingly, Sarabia could become Beccacece’s toughest test this coming Monday after the most recent game. On a Wednesday in Gijón, it became clear that sustaining continuity with Elche would be pointless if results against the Principality side did not improve those ambitions.
Beccacece has always seemed less a fixture inside Elche than a reaction to the external world of the club. He arrived with a genuine curiosity about the football played by Andorra’s squad, even though he was still a newcomer to the Second League. The coach embraced a bold philosophy: attacking football, forward thinking, and a willingness to press from the back. These elements formed the foundation of his plan for the Franjiverde team. In the previous season, Andorra finished seventh with 59 points and even flirted with a promotion playoff at times. They earned the reputation as a side that scored a lot, tallying 58 goals for in a campaign marked by audacious, possession-oriented football. The Andorra side, which carries the DNA of FC Barcelona, drew admiration from Beccacece, and his own ideas about playing out from the back resonated with that style, offering a mirror through which Elche could reflect and refine its approach.
In discussions with the Elche sports commission and its owner, Christian Bragarnik, Sarabia’s team from Andorra was strongly considered as a source of talent. Three players stood out in particular. Sinan Bakis, a striker with German roots and Turkish passport, contributed 12 goals and was seen as a potential signing for Elche. Bakis’s move would come with a substantial salary package, close to one million euros, a figure that would place him among the higher earners in the Second League. A second notable figure was Marc Aguado, whose style Sarabia believed could be pivotal to a system keyed to mobility and ball circulation. The third was Germán Valera, a right-sided midfielder and winger who had arrived on loan to Fran Escriba from Atlético de Madrid, a move that carried the promise of creativity on the flanks. These three players represented the trio most heavily highlighted by Andorra in the prior season, and their potential arrivals were seen as a strategic way to infuse Elche with the energy and ideas Sarabia admired.
As the season progressed, Andorra’s influence remained clear. Yet the team’s absence of those key pieces weighed on their results. Without the trio, Andorra slipped in the standings, finishing sixteenth with ten points from three wins, one draw, and five losses. That finish put them just a single point behind Elche, underscoring how delicate the balance is when the squad lacks depth in crucial areas. The eye remained on the tactical underpinnings and how they could translate to Elche’s setup, especially given Beccacece’s affinity for a brave, high-intensity approach that favored pressing higher up the pitch and building attacks from the back rather than relying solely on physical aerial duels or long balls. The contrast between the two clubs offered a practical laboratory for evaluating whether a daring, possession-heavy system could translate into consistent results within Spain’s competitive Second Division.
The upcoming Monday match loomed large. Beccacece, who had admired Andorra’s football from the outside in the previous season, could now see his own project put to the test against Sarabia’s squad. If Andorra could execute its plan with precision, they might expose vulnerabilities in Elche’s newly formed framework. If Elche could replicate the energy and discipline Beccacece favored, they might harness a momentum that had so often eluded them in earlier campaigns. Either way, the encounter promised to reveal how a coach’s philosophy, once nurtured in a different environment, can be translated into a concrete performance on a Spanish pitch. This head-to-head, more than anything, would crystallize the evolving narrative around Beccacece’s debut season and his long-term influence on a club striving to rewrite its recent history. In the press and among fans, speculation would be tempered by the on-field realities that Monday would provide, setting the tone for what could be a turning point in Beccacece’s Spanish chapter as he contemplates what Elche can become under his watch. These are the kinds of matchups that turn a season into a case study, offering insights not just into tactics, but into leadership, risk, and the capacity to reshape a club’s identity. The test, then, would be about more than the result; it would be about whether Beccacece’s voice could harmonize with Andorra’s example to push Elche toward a more ambitious, modern way of playing. The dynamics of this encounter would echo beyond the final whistle, shaping perceptions of the coach’s early legacy in Spanish football.