After hours justice accepted this THERE IS skipped images Keys to solving a goal Griezmann Which was important? landing Spanish, The Perico club issued a statement explaining the path it will follow to defend its interests from now on.
Blue and white club will undertake Legal proceedings will be initiated and ordinary justice will be pursued Two Madrid courts ruled that those responsible for the VAR of the match against Atlético de Madrid He will not move towards the 36th matchday (3-3). A. Griezmann’s ghost goal It eventually stood, depriving the Lovebirds of some points that could be key to their bid to avoid relegation.
constant fight
Melero Lopez, The referee of the match approved the goal after going to VAR. As later confirmed Clos Gomez, As VAR responsible for that match, the only footage they used to confirm the goal was the footage shown on broadcast, but the court ruled that other footage was omitted. they could change this decision final.
Espanyol had already challenged this clash at the time, but competition committee He rejected his objection. Now after analyzing this last failure legal services, will continue his struggle by applying ordinary justice, as explained in the description below:
“Last Wednesday, Madrid’s courts 32 and 47 new evidence Regarding the events that took place in the match played between RCD Espanyol and Club Atlético de Madrid from Barcelona From the 36th matchday of last season. Once we have promptly handed over the information to our legal services and its analysis has been completed, RCD Espanyol will judge’s conclusions and as a result of the analysis, the following decision was reached: take legal action In the ordinary field of justice to defend the interests of our club, our members and our fans.
We understand this considering Proof provided that images were removed for a decisive play for that match and the qualifying results of the season, Our right and obligation to defend the interests From RCD Espanyol until: final results in this case in the judicial field.
Annulled deportation of Vinicius
It is worth remembering that even at that time, our side objected to the match because we felt that we were seriously harmed by this decision, and at the same time insisted on the precedent decision put forward by the other side, which was referred to in the judicial decision (annulment or ineffectiveness of the expulsion decision). the incoming player Real Madrid Vinicius JuniorAfter removing a number of images from the match Valencia CF – Real Madrid CF).
Today we know what happened at that meeting ( Atlético de Madrid awarded a goal that should never have entered the scoreboard) goes far beyond human errors It is understandable in the field of sports. This decision and other situations that, in our opinion, are still not understood today, to reject We understand that in our last match against UD Almería we could struggle to avoid on the field of play.
For all this and To defend our institution and our social mass, “We are taking legal action to clarify the incident and compensate for the damage caused.”