The Spanish international appeared before the media after his statements about Rubiales and Jenni Hermoso.
“I have decided not to comment,” Dani Carvajal said at the press conference with the Spanish national team on Wednesday. But he did. “At this level of media, the consequences are very big. We are in the spotlight, both for the good and the bad. I wish there was more talk about the championship won by women’s football. I’m not going to comment. Everyone can do whatever they want.” I think it’s convenient and I’d rather not do it.”
The fear is clear: his opinion is unpopular and he will not express it explicitly in front of millions of people. That makes sense, because there are people who believe that what is being done with Luis Rubiales is a “hunt.” They say it in private, but no one does it in public except their mother in a church. And while Carvajal says he has no opinion, he’s made it very clear. First Tuesday in ‘Radio Stadium’ (‘It will have to be the estates that determine whether Jenni Hermoso is a victim or not’) and later in her appearance for the media.
“Everything I said is clear. I defend the presumption of innocence, which is a constitutional right, and I abide by it. I cannot victimize or blame anyone without a final verdict”, cThe Spain international answered one of the many questions he was asked about the kiss Rubiales stole from Jenni Hermoso after the women’s World Cup final. “The opinion I have of Rubiales is that he has an excellent professional treatment. As a player he has always helped us in an exceptional way in terms of families, championships and so on, and I am not one who can make or break the RFEF. “
It is clear that Dani is weighed down by the link with the President of the Federation. disguise your opinion because the one you have is not popular. The presumption of innocence is differenteasy to understand. The whole world saw what happened to Rubiales and Jenni at the World Cup awards ceremony. Everyone saw him touching his genitals in a box in front of Queen Letizia, Infanta Sofía and other authorities. The scene is unpleasant in any context, but reprehensible for the position it occupies.
Everyone heard Rubiales’ statements on Radio Marca and on La Cope, insulting everyone and reacting as he did during the first hours. There is no presumption of innocence, it is not something that needs to be proven because the whole planet has seen it live and directly. Carvajal’s opinion is clear as he’s seen everything he’s seen and it doesn’t seem enough to judge him. Or at least to point out. There is no presumption of innocence in this case, because no one can say “we’ll see if he kissed her”. And she already said there was no permission.
“At no point did I say that Jenni is not the victim, only that the presumption of innocence should be maintained. If she’s having a hard time, show solidarity with her. I don’t think the president has a problem. good time too. I’m not here to classify anyone.” There, Carvajal makes his point clear again, trying to victimize Rubiales. It’s clear that Hermoso is the victim. Rubiales is obviously struggling too. He knows he was wrong. He knows what he did, he knows he did wrong and as a result of all this FIFA has suspended him.
Source: Goal