The Prosecutor’s Office rejects the Supreme Sports Council’s (CSD) special prosecution of corruption allegations in the procedure brought in the Negreira case, because the organization, in its view, cannot be considered a damaged or offended party. In the summary of EL PERIÓDICO, available from the Prensa Ibérica group, the prosecution claims that this organization “legitimately” understands: changing cleanliness at a sporting event “offends” ethical principlesdoesn’t make him “legal offended” without “further ado”. He thinks the same about the ‘Un crit valent’ appearance of the Barça association. FC Barcelona, on the other hand, asked the judge to appear both under investigation and as a special prosecution, as he felt harm had been done to him.
prosecutors Luis Garcia Canton and Ricardo Sanz-Gadea “The concept of socially hurt and offended must be assumed to have nothing to do with a strict legal consideration, and this information seems important to us”. In this sense, they imply the law that includes the crime of corruption in sports in the Criminal Code and that its aim is to “ensure fair and honest competition”. In other words, they say “free and fair competition” must be protected. And it adds The concept of “damaged” is “inflicted moral harm or damage”. for the commission of a crime. According to him, based on these parameters, the CSD does not meet the “minimum requirements” to be considered a special prosecution.
“Neither moral or material damage”
“For some petitioners who have no relation (not even nearly) to the fair free competition of a competition to which they have no more relevance than that of the mere spectators, there is no moral harm to bequeath (to carry on the charge).” Therefore, prosecutors insist that they “cannot be the victim of non-material damage, even indirectly, due to actions attributed to FC Barcelona or their leaders”. They also add that “generic” tutelage of sport has been granted to the CSD, including “attributed to it through the arbitration system from a strict organizational perspective”. Can’t upgrade you to “damaged or embittered” in a crime that “protects” “free and fair competition”. Judge Silvia López Mejías, the trainer of the case, is waiting to resolve requests for participation, including those from Real Madrid.
The prosecution also opposes the claim of La Liga, in which the Spanish Football Federation also participates, to apply the investigation to José María Enríquez Negreira’s son Javier Enríquez Romero, considering that the understanding of the data provided is “hasty”. “Build a massive incriminating evidence base at this embryonic moment of the investigation”. He stressed that it was “prudent” to wait for the results of investigations conducted by the Civil Guard.
On the other hand, La Liga asked the judge to identify the people who were part of the so-called organization. Tax Risk Committee It is alleged that various auditing companies conducted internal investigations for the Barça establishment, including Barça and the ‘Negreira case’. Also, the Barcelona side is seeking a bail of 500,000 euros for Real Madrid to settle the specific charge.