Joan Laporta It was released this Monday to present the expected clarifications about the Negreira case. Two months after the scandal broke, when SER Catalunya revealed that Barça had paid at least 1.4m euros to José María Enríquez Negreira, who was then Vice President of Technical Referees. In the investigation carried out by the Barcelona Prosecutor’s Office in the following weeks, it was determined that the referee leader and his son from the Barça club collected 7.5 million euros over 17 years. A term from 2001 to 2018 that included the tenure of four presidents: Joan Gaspart (2000-2003), Joan Laporta (2003-2010), Sandro Rosell (2010-2014) and Josep Maria Bartomeu (2014-2018). He decided to cut ties with Enríquez). Barça active “a external, independent and rigorous research“, as Laporta emphasizes in this regard. This Monday, he will present his results, which must answer at least five questions.
Who signed the first contract with Enríquez Negreira for Barça?
no one answered Early documents to this question place the origin of the contract with the arbitration leader in the time of Gaspart (2001), but other information indicates that this may have begun in the final years of Núñez’s term, which began in 1978 and ended in 2000.
However, the club has not made any contribution, even after a month since the scandal broke out. no concrete information The first president, who knitted the number two relationship of the arbitration institution, answered this question. It is not yet known who the ‘intellectual author’ of that contract is.
Why didn’t any president break that economic relationship with the then Vice President of Technical Referees?
gaspart said I was not aware. As Rosell, then vice president of sports (2003-05), explained to Cadena SER at one of the first meetings of this board, “if we want to continue to respect us, we have to keep paying,” Laporta said.
He has not made any public statements, now the president after learning of these payments (2010-2014). Rosell was quiet, while Bartomeu made sure that Enríquez had quadrupled his bill after Laporta bragged about it. he was the one who “turned off the tap”. No one came out to explain why they didn’t break this contract. The truth is that, according to the summary, spending started with Gaspart, grew with Laporta, bounced with Rosell and stayed high with Bartomeu.
What was Enríquez Negreira really doing for Barça?
In its first and only official statement on the scandal (February 15), the club admitted that it “has in the past hired the services of an external technical adviser who provides technical reports in video format referring to players in the Spanish subcategory”. He also noted that the relationship with the external provider itself has been expanded with technical reports on professional arbitration to supplement the information needed by the first team and subsidiary coaching staff, which is common practice in professional football clubs. “.
Barça never mentions Enríquez Negreira. Neither did his son. I just need this”external suppliers They made videos, technical reports of players from various quarters and referee reports. No one has clarified the exact content of these reports. The first team’s goals beyond providing information to the coaching team are also something that Valverde or Tata Martino’s assistant, for example, reject because they haven’t seen these documents.
Who knew about the existence of payments to Enríquez Negreira and his son at Barça?
Barça did not respond to this question. It was learned that there was a very limited circle of people who were aware of the existence of this agreement with the arbitration leader.
As can be seen from the subpoena of the Barcelona Prosecutor’s Office, which appointed two top executives during the Bartomeu era, they were all highly reliable people of the respective president (the club’s CEO was Òscar Grau and Albert Soler). was the director of professional sports) on the list.
payments passed all internal controls of the organizationThey were also not included in the economic report or in the annual audits. The club has yet to reveal the total cost of the 17-year relationship with Enríquez Negreira.
Who set the price? And why was it rising?
He has decided to cut any president – up to the last four during his long relationship with the arbitration leader – until the ‘Enríquez fee’ has increased over the years to reach 7.5m euros. Therefore it is unknown who accepted the first price and also reasons that increase in every president.
Barça has yet to disclose the total cost of this relationship with Enríquez. He also did not disclose season-to-season payment details for videos and reports produced by some of the companies of the former referee (Dasnil 95 and Nisdal) and his son Javier Enríquez (Soccercam SL).
Joan Laporta It was released this Monday to present the expected clarifications about the Negreira case. Two months after the scandal broke, when SER Catalunya revealed that Barça had paid at least 1.4m euros to José María Enríquez Negreira, who was then Vice President of Technical Referees. In the investigation carried out by the Barcelona Prosecutor’s Office in the following weeks, it was determined that the referee leader and his son from the Barça club collected 7.5 million euros over 17 years. A term from 2001 to 2018 that included the tenure of four presidents: Joan Gaspart (2000-2003), Joan Laporta (2003-2010), Sandro Rosell (2010-2014) and Josep Maria Bartomeu (2014-2018). He decided to cut ties with Enríquez). Barça active “a external, independent and rigorous research“, as Laporta emphasizes in this regard. This Monday, he will present his results, which must answer at least five questions.
Who signed the first contract with Enríquez Negreira for Barça?
no one answered Early documents to this question place the origin of the contract with the arbitration leader in the time of Gaspart (2001), but other information indicates that this may have begun in the final years of Núñez’s term, which began in 1978 and ended in 2000.
However, the club has not made any contribution, even after a month since the scandal broke out. no concrete information The first president, who knitted the number two relationship of the arbitration institution, answered this question. It is not yet known who the ‘intellectual author’ of that contract is.
Why didn’t any president break that economic relationship with the then Vice President of Technical Referees?
gaspart said I was not aware. As Rosell, then vice president of sports (2003-05), explained to Cadena SER at one of the first meetings of this board, “if we want to continue to respect us, we have to keep paying,” Laporta said.
He has not made any public statements, now the president after learning of these payments (2010-2014). Rosell was quiet, while Bartomeu made sure that Enríquez had quadrupled his bill after Laporta bragged about it. he was the one who “turned off the tap”. No one came out to explain why they didn’t break this contract. The truth is that, according to the summary, spending started with Gaspart, grew with Laporta, bounced with Rosell and stayed high with Bartomeu.
What was Enríquez Negreira really doing for Barça?
In its first and only official statement on the scandal (February 15), the club admitted that it “has in the past hired the services of an external technical adviser who provides technical reports in video format referring to players in the Spanish subcategory”. He also noted that the relationship with the external provider itself has been expanded with technical reports on professional arbitration to supplement the information needed by the first team and subsidiary coaching staff, which is common practice in professional football clubs. “.
Barça never mentions Enríquez Negreira. Neither did his son. I just need this”external suppliers They made videos, technical reports of players from various quarters and referee reports. No one has clarified the exact content of these reports. The first team’s goals beyond providing information to the coaching team are also something that Valverde or Tata Martino’s assistant, for example, reject because they haven’t seen these documents.
Who knew about the existence of payments to Enríquez Negreira and his son at Barça?
Barça did not respond to this question. It was learned that there was a very limited circle of people who were aware of the existence of this agreement with the arbitration leader.
As can be seen from the subpoena of the Barcelona Prosecutor’s Office, which appointed two top executives during the Bartomeu era, they were all highly reliable people of the respective president (the club’s CEO was Òscar Grau and Albert Soler). was the director of professional sports) on the list.
payments passed all internal controls of the organizationThey were also not included in the economic report or in the annual audits. The club has yet to reveal the total cost of the 17-year relationship with Enríquez Negreira.
Who set the price? And why was it rising?
He has decided to cut any president – up to the last four during his long relationship with the arbitration leader – until the ‘Enríquez fee’ has increased over the years to reach 7.5m euros. Therefore it is unknown who accepted the first price and also reasons that increase in every president.
Barça has yet to disclose the total cost of this relationship with Enríquez. He also did not disclose season-to-season payment details for videos and reports produced by some of the companies of the former referee (Dasnil 95 and Nisdal) and his son Javier Enríquez (Soccercam SL).