Spartak reported that FIFA has instructed West Ham to pay the rent of the former red and white player.

No time to read?
Get a summary

The International Football Association (FIFA) has instructed London’s West Ham United to pay rent from Moscow’s Spartak Czech midfielder Alex Kral.

The amount that the English club owes for hiring a Czech football player is about 5 million Euros. West Ham transferred the money to the account of the English Football Association after the start of a special military operation. The amount is as much as the accounts of red and white people opened in Russian banks.

After that, the funds were returned to the London club. In the fall of 2022, Spartak filed an application with the FIFA court against the British for the collection of debts.

“The Londoners have been ordered to pay the full amount under the transfer agreement plus interest on Alex King’s loan.

If West Ham does not pay this amount within 45 days, the club may be banned from registering new players and the case may be referred to the FIFA Disciplinary Committee after three transfer periods.

At the same time, Londoners can request the reasoned part of the decision from FIFA within ten days and appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) within 21 days from the date of receipt of the reasoned part. ” excerpts from the club’s press service “Sports Express”.

King played for Spartak from 2019 to 2021, after which he moved to West Ham.

Recall that on June 21, the International Football Federation allowed foreign players and coaches to suspend their contracts with Russian clubs until June 30, 2023. Prior to that, the permit was valid until 30 June 2022.

Former former football player of the Russian national team Alexander Mostovoy judicial Spartak’s main problem.

No time to read?
Get a summary
Previous Article

The White House announced the announcement of a new military aid package to Kiev this week.

Next Article

OUR INTERVIEW. Prof. Jabłoński: I don’t know if Markowski wants to be a TVN spokesperson. Defending the JPII report is an insult to good taste