Former Lokomotiv Moscow and Russian national team player Dmitry Bulykin talked about which teams surprised him, good and bad, after the resumption of the Russian Premier League (RPL) season, also talked about refereeing and pointed out that the referees made many controversial decisions.
“In a good way, I surprised Lokomotiv together with Dzyuba. Bad – CSKA and Spartak, but in the second case there are more questions for the judges and it can be attributed to Krasnodar. These teams were supposed to go well after the winter break, but it did not happen.
With “Spartak” you can appeal to the referees, but as players like to say, it was necessary to win without the judges. You have to be a head taller so that the referees don’t get confused. If you look at other matches, you can always refer to the referees, there are always questions, there are always 50v50 border decisions that can be made both in one direction and the other. There are many decisions that only judges interpret, there are many points left to the Expert Judiciary Commission. They already decide whether the judge is right or not. Now such matches are stubborn that the referee’s decisions are very important.
I did not fully understand [в матче «Спартак» — «Урал»]they whistled and why they were not counted, so we will wait for the decision of the expert commission. And there are many decisions when the referees make mistakes, but here you can not do anything, after the match it is too late to prove anything, because the score will not change, ”Bulykin said in a conversation with socialbites.ca.
Lokomotiv beat Rostov 3:1, Spartak drew with Ural (2:2), lost to CSKA Sochi and Krasnodar could not beat Torpedo (2:2).
Earlier it was reported that Moscow “Locomotive” Artem Dzyuba is a striker. shared Emotions that made a hat-trick in the match against Rostov in the Russian Premier League (RPL).