The kennel | Goal.com Spain

Gil Marín sang ‘La Traviata’. He made a verb what his fans denounce. That when in doubt, the coin always falls on the same side. continue. The reality is that the clubs are complaining about a system they feed and don’t fix because it’s more comfortable to blame the referees all the time. Let him who is free from sin cast the first stone. Here the recipe has been applied clearly and colorlessly. If you lose, to cry, to Carmen. Or to ‘La Lloreria’. The system? There is no conspiracy. What is there is instruction. It consists of avoiding noise as much as possible, because everyone knows what is best. This is the first time that the Atleti fans are in favor of something their CEO is doing. Why? Well, because at the end of the movie, Gil’s statement talks about something that’s taboo in this country. From the Madrid area and its influence. To date, Gil Marín has not received an official answer from Madrid, but from his surroundings. Of his pagafantas and mascachapas. Toshack used to say if you buy a dog don’t bark because that’s what a dog is for. bark

They say that Gil Marín is a perpetrator and blames the referees for his season. It is enough to know how to read it or feel like getting to the third paragraph of the statement: “Those responsible for not passing the group stage of the Champions League and for the fact that we are 7 points behind third place, we are.” One I’ll put you in, Aniceto. Florentino’s Corifeos say Atleti cannot complain about the arbitration, as Simeone said years ago that he saw the league “dangerously prepared” for Madrid and that Atleti won the title that year. Lie. That title belonged to him. barca. Louis said: “Kill Me But Don’t Lie”. No one corrects and lies with impunity, because it is convenient. They say Atleti are a crying club but no statement from Atleti is withheld after the arbitration in a Champions League final where the only legal goal was scored by Atleti. Zero covers.

They say Atleti are self conscious and put pressure on the federation but unless there is a better opinion it was not Atleti chairman who called the umpires chairman as he revealed thebesnoting that from that day on there was a before and after in the VAR. The servants say Gil Marín’s criticism of arbitration is exaggerated, but it wasn’t the Atleti journalists who put a referee on the front page, calling him a hangman and putting him on target. The badulaques in the media say that Gil Marín makes a fool of himself, but the truth is that those who make a fool of themselves are the ones who criticize Gil Marín more for this statement than for that obfuscation that they kept silent like whores. They say that Gil Marín has hit rock bottom for criticizing the arbitration system, but curiously, those who support it are the same ones who made the hoax of ‘Villarato’the placebo effect of Real Madrid. Blowing and slurping, that’s not possible.

They say Gil Marín deserves a sanction for saying that Leaving Madrid with 10 players in their stadium are big words, but the people who have television at home can see how Nacho, with a yellow card, prevented a competitor throw-in against Real by touching the ball with his hand, without being sent off. Like he played for the Milwaukee Bucks and was the cousin of antetokounmpo. Earlier there could have been a penalty for Rüdiger, but that is interpretation. Nachos, like Imanol’s later on, was pure and harsh regulation. They say that Gil Marín is the victim but only one game was enough to verify that, it seems that leaving Madrid with 10 players in their stadium is big words because only then is it understood that a referee does not apply the rules and looks the other way. There is no interpretation possible. Regulations only. And when other clubs denounce it, when there are images that are not up for discussion, the kennel barks. If a finger points to the sky, the fool looks at the finger.

Reuben Uria