A group former managers Valencia Community Football Federation (FFCV), Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor Complaining to the General Directorate of Sports of the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports of Valencia and about the current head of this institution, Salvador Gomarfor embezzlement, advance notice and embezzlement.
According to the documents that EFE claims to have reached, the prosecutor’s office launched a criminal investigation and appointed a prosecutor. instructor which to analyze the complaint leader accused of raising his salary irregularly and supporting and unilaterally taking advantage of a regional club at the expense of another.
As noted complaintAccompanied by numerous meetings and meeting minutes, Gomar, became president in 2018has been gradually increase your salary without the consent of the so-called previous directive and assume a grant It was sent from the Spanish Football Federation (FEF), which should in principle be. aiming to professionalize different areas of the region.
Complainants, Gomar’s already He managed to increase his salary in 2019 to 112,526 Euros per year.When Vincent MunozThe previous president had perceived 62,597.
In this sense, the complainants remind that the current head of the FFCV will also submit it to the parliament for approval next Friday. From 152.000 to 170.000 EuroAccording to this newspaper released last week.
It is also included in Gomar’s complaint that he placed an order with the finance department of the FFCV on December 31, 2021. prepare a payroll of 34,000 euros in your favor proceed with immediate unauthorized payment of said transfer in accordance with the federation’s regulatory procedures according to information obtained by the news agency.
They accuse him of supporting Alcoyano with the assets of the FFCV and unilaterally preventing the team’s administrative relegation due to non-payment.
Another point of condemnation of the president is Guaranteed by the legacy of the FFCV and unilaterally “Without notifying any of those responsible for the economic field” for alcoholic against the RFEF for the salaries owed to the players of the club in question and to prevent the team’s administrative relegation.
This decision, reportedly, “Damaged other clubs affiliated with FFCV fulfilling their obligations, they could see their sports rights improved by correspondence to occupy the sports venue of the sports organization approved according to the regulations”.
The letter reminded that the FFCV must remain “neutral to all partners, or at least so that some of them are not harmed to the benefit of others.” In this case, the affected club was HerculesWhich can be promoted if Alcoyano fails to fulfill his obligations to the players.
Avoiding Deportivo’s administrative relegation, also FFCV’s Hercules suffered losses and could be promoted if Alcoyano lost his place.
“Had the FFCV president not approved it unilaterally and alone with his assets, Alcoyano would have suffered a decline as envisaged by the regulations and would correspond to occupying said place to Hercules“an FFCV-affiliated club that has been harmed by an arbitrary act of the president, lacking regulatory support, intentionally benefiting the club in question, knowingly and knowingly harming other partners of the same Federation.”
Finally, in the same letter, it is reported that Salvador Gomar continues. receive salary as president “during the period when he is not in the office in question”.
In this sense, the legal text reminds the FFCV that 27 days elapsed from his resignation until he was re-elected, although he had no professional relationship. Make sure to be registered with Social Security and continue to receive salary and salary amounts in addition to using the FFCV card“.
Some sources quoted by EFE denied the agency that there was such an event. irregularities in the administration of Salvador Gomar, referred to as “transparent and exemplary”. “Everything has always been approved in an economic commission, so If there is irregularity, the complainants are also a part of it.They add before adding that “they do not have official information regarding the complaint made to the prosecutor’s office”.