The ongoing discussions between Armenia and Azerbaijan over a peace agreement have encountered notable shifts. According to reports from TASS, the Armenian side has observed a mixed trajectory in the negotiations, with certain sections of the text showing backward movement while others display progress. Armenian Foreign Minister Ararat Mirzoyan stressed that the team has engaged in constructive exchanges and submitted these proposals to Baku for consideration during a joint briefing with Greek Foreign Minister Giorgos Gerapetritis.
On the Azerbaijani side, a senior official emphasized that meaningful gains have been made in shaping the treaty language. The remarks from Hikmet Hajiyev, who heads the presidential foreign policy administration, underscored a sense of forward momentum in the process and portrayed the negotiations as moving toward substantive milestones that could anchor a durable agreement.
In the broader regional landscape, authorities in Baku announced a security operation in Nagorno-Karabakh, presenting the move as a response to what were described as large-scale provocations. The operation was framed as a task to disarm and withdraw Armenian military units from the region. A ceasefire was subsequently established with the involvement of Russian peacekeepers, and the peace talks have continued to unfold under the watchful eye of external mediators. This sequence of events has fed into the negotiations, shaping both the internal political dynamics and the international dialogue around the conflict, as reported by various outlets and corroborated in formal statements by the parties involved.
In Yerevan, there has been a reiteration of the intention to pursue dialogue with Baku through Western platforms, signaling a continued preference for multilateral engagement as part of the peace process. The intricate balance of security concerns, territorial questions, and regional influence remains central to the discussions, with stakeholders emphasizing the importance of stable, verifiable steps toward demilitarization, normalization of relations, and long-term coexistence in the South Caucasus. The evolving negotiations reflect a complex interplay of national interests, international mediation efforts, and the lived realities of people affected by the conflict, as observers note a persistent push toward a comprehensive settlement that can withstand political shifts on both sides. [citation]”}