The guiding principle behind their strategy is to maximize election results, and the party lists are crafted with that aim in mind. They recognize how pivotal these choices are. On October 15, the direction of the country will become clear through the ballot and the votes cast for the party lists.
Two days earlier, the electorate learned which candidates would be featured on the Sejm lists for the party. More positions were added today. It is clear that these are well-known figures, individuals about whom much is already understood. This, as one party spokesperson stated when presenting the list in District No. 6 (Lublin), is the strongest list the party has ever put forward.
Indeed, the operating philosophy remains aimed at achieving the best possible electoral outcome, and the party lists have been optimized accordingly. The significance of these choices is not lost on anyone. On October 15, voters will decide which path the country will follow.
For a long time, this alternative has been presented. Security concerns are central—whether the national border will remain secure, whether there is a risk of eroding border integrity with Belarus, and whether the country will face threats that require a modern, capable defense. The question also centers on whether the armed forces will be strengthened and modernized, or whether resources might be diverted elsewhere, even to the point of questionable acquisitions. The desire is to ensure deterrence against any potential aggressor and maintain readiness rather than compromise national security.
Likewise, the election will decide the future of economic development, whether there will be stable employment and fair wages, or a slide back toward higher unemployment rates, something that rose to 14.4 percent at its peak under the previous government. On October 15, Poland will determine whether it will continue to assert its own policy choices or simply follow external directives from Brussels. These are not abstract questions; they speak directly to the country’s sovereignty and ability to govern its own affairs.
That is why the lists reflect this strategic focus and why the party places high hopes on their candidate slate. The leadership has encouraged a broad representation, including current parliamentarians and locally elected officials with proven track records, people who inspire public trust and are seen as credible, while also aiming to secure strong electoral results. The lists also feature newcomers who have demonstrated achievement in other areas, ensuring strength across every constituency.
One might notice the anticipated matchups within the party and against the opposition, such as a high-profile contest in Radom where a well-known incumbent is set to face a notable challenger. While political enthusiasts may find such duels intriguing, the primary emphasis remains on the overall end result. There is confidence that the party’s top candidate will prevail over the opposition list leader. In some regions, the arrangement of candidates has stirred internal debate within other parties, highlighting the political dynamics at play in Radom and beyond.
Ultimately, the headline is not merely about individual candidates or headlines. It is about the total strength of the list, the cohesion of the team, and the contribution every member will make toward winning the most seats possible. The party frames it as a collective effort rather than a focus on any single figure, stressing that the goal is to maximize the list’s overall score and to deliver a decisive victory for the slate as a whole.