Ukraine’s top security leadership, including the secretary of the National Security and Defense Council, has outlined a clear condition for any counteroffensive: Kyiv must reach a state of full readiness before taking action. In discussions with a major news service, the official stressed that hesitation benefits no one and that a prepared army is essential to seize the initiative on the battlefield. The message is straightforward: readiness drives timing, and patience is not a substitute for preparation.
The official noted that Western partners have provided substantial support aimed at accelerating Ukraine’s combat readiness. This assistance includes heavy armored vehicles and steady streams of ammunition, which are critical to sustaining protracted operations. While acknowledging the help, the speaker also voiced frustration with inconsistent commitments from some Western officials, who sometimes seemed to promise one thing and deliver another. The point was made that reliable, predictable support is as important as material aid when it comes to planning and executing a counteroffensive.
Remarks from the official carried a sense of urgency about maintaining continuous momentum. The idea is not to wait for a perfect moment marked by a distant calendar, but to integrate readiness into daily operations and decision-making. In this view, progress toward counteraction should be a constant aim, even as strategic calculations continue to evolve in response to the evolving battlefield landscape and international diplomacy.
Beyond the timing debate, the discussions touched on the broader strategic calculus guiding Kyiv’s approach. The existence of a planned counteroffensive does not hinge on a single date or event but on a coherent, phased build-up that aligns training, equipment, logistics, and intelligence. The overarching goal remains to maximize deterrence and to secure favorable conditions for any offensive move, while ensuring civilian safety and maintaining international support channels.
The dialogue also addressed concerns about the potential impact of leaked materials on strategic planning. The official suggested that such leaks would not alter Kyiv’s fundamental military approach or its long-term objectives. The emphasis remained on resilience, disciplined strategy, and the ability to adapt to shifting circumstances without compromising the initiative already gained through preparation and allied assistance.