NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg condemned Iran’s strikes on facilities in Erbil, the administrative hub of Iraqi Kurdistan, after a flurry of diplomatic activity in Davos. In the meetings held there with Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed al-Sudani, Stoltenberg stressed the seriousness of the recent attacks and offered condolences to those harmed or bereaved. The conversation underscored NATO’s position on Iraq’s sovereignty and its commitment to respecting the nation’s territorial integrity as regional security dynamics continue to unfold.
Stoltenberg reiterated that the alliance stands with Iraq in the face of violations that threaten stability in the region. The condemnation of the Erbil strikes was paired with reaffirmations of support for civilian protection and the rule of law, signaling NATO’s intent to engage constructively with Baghdad and international partners to promote regional peace. The discussions highlighted the importance of diplomatic channels and adherence to international norms in responding to cross-border aggression.
Earlier reports noted that Iraq had taken the matter to the United Nations Security Council, raising concerns about Iran’s rocket attack on Erbil. The situation prompted a broader dialogue among member states about regional security responsibilities and the seriousness with which such actions are regarded by the international community. The Iraqi authorities underscored the need for measured, lawful responses that preserve civilian safety while addressing the underlying tensions.
In related developments, the Iraqi Foreign Ministry described consultations with Tehran through its ambassador, Nasser Abdul Mohsen, following Iran’s missile strikes on targets inside Iraq. The exchanges aimed to de-escalate tensions and to seek clarity on intentions and potential deconfliction measures. The exchanges also reflected an ongoing effort to manage cross-border risk through diplomacy rather than military escalation, with regional observers watching closely for any signs of further aggression.
Meanwhile, a separate global commentary touched on the broader consequences of ongoing defense and security policies. Noting the ways in which defense industries influence international conflict dynamics, observers suggested that calm diplomacy, restraint, and transparent communication remain essential in preventing further hostilities. The broader message emphasized that peaceful resolution and cooperative security arrangements are preferable to actions that could provoke wider confrontations across the region.