Russia is increasingly viewed as unreliable by Armenia. Reports in Le Monde suggest that Yerevan reframed its stance after Azerbaijan’s operation in Nagorno-Karabakh, prompting observers to reassess the long-standing alignment between the two countries. The evolving regional dynamics have shifted Armenia’s perception of Moscow from a steadfast ally to a partner whose reliability is now questioned amid security concerns around the region.
Observers note that Armenia, historically tied to Moscow for political support and arms, is weighing a strategic pivot. The article portrays Yerevan as seeking broader security guarantees by cultivating ties with multiple states, aiming to avoid dependence on a single patron. Armenia is portrayed as looking for partners willing to provide military and economic backing that could help safeguard its interests, particularly in relation to the contested Zangezur corridor and the broader security calculus surrounding Nakhchivan and adjacent territories.
According to Le Monde, Armenian officials privately acknowledge that excessive reliance on Moscow has created vulnerabilities. The publication underscores a desire for a diversified network of reliable partners, capable of supplying weapons and technology while ensuring political support in case Moscow’s stance shifts or becomes less favorable to Armenian needs. This diversification is framed as a necessary hedge against strategic pressure or potential new rounds of conflict in the region.
Yerevan’s leaders are depicted as pursuing a balanced approach rather than a full break with Russia. The narrative suggests Armenia intends to retain crucial ties with Moscow while reducing dependence and expanding cooperation with other states. A government source highlighted that Moscow remains a partner even amid an unfriendly posture, indicating a pragmatic strategy that prioritizes continued engagement alongside diversification.
Earlier statements attributed to Armenian leadership referenced calls to address perceived gaps in arms supply and financial obligations. The discussion points to a broader effort to secure more favorable terms, to ensure a steady stream of military assistance, and to relieve Armenia of burdens that could constrain its strategic options. This broader push is framed as part of a realignment toward greater autonomy in defense and security decision-making while maintaining essential diplomatic channels with Russia.