Publicist Rafał Ziemkiewicz boasted on the X platform of a large number of replays of his conversation with Krzysztof Stanowski on Channel Zero, despite the hate he received after this program. His entry led to an exchange between him and Onet journalist Janusz Schwertner.
The conversation with @K_Stanowski has been viewed 720,000 times after 7 days. plays – clearly more than most conversations in the “Zero Hour” series. Despite the raging, manipulative hatred of @DWielowieyska @SchwertnerPL and other officers of the peasant agitprop – and perhaps a little because of him. Therefore, I wish that this community would pour water on their heads during Dyngus. Preferably cold
– wrote on the X platform Rafał Ziemkiewicz.
That’s not the point. Of course you have a large number of readers and recipients, you are important to them. I don’t deny that. What I mean is that even the suicide of a child and the trauma of the family after death do not set boundaries for you. The gentleman, to the delight of the crowd, suggests the mother’s influence on the child’s suicide without having the slightest idea of it. You think about a mother pushing her own child into the hands of a pedophile. What is this actually? You’re still laughing while spouting these idiocies. You know, it’s so weak and rude that it’s impossible not to react. This is not a violation of political correctness, just rudeness and an extreme, pathological lack of empathy. Even considering that the government media treated this child’s tragedy as political loot. They had fun with it and wrote about the ‘Pedophile Platform’. The 15-year-old boy disappeared from your sight, the media played with his tragedy in the most cruel way. Sorry, but there’s no point in bragging about your results if you achieve them this way
— responded aggressively to the columnist’s submission Janusz Schwertnerwithout adding that, unfortunately, the suicide death of Filiks’ son was then used by KO to attack PiS.
“You are participating in the lying propaganda of a politician who strives for authoritarian rule.”
You are participating in the false propaganda of a politician seeking authoritarian rule – I think deliberately, because you are giving the impression of a depraved person rather than a person so stupid as to ignore obvious facts. The political and media operation of fomenting hatred towards Tusk’s political enemies by attributing responsibility to them for the death of MP Filiks’ son was another implementation of the pattern previously applied to Adamowicz’s coffin, and even earlier in Blida (and, in a slightly different form, Szczęsny). You can see the same know-how of unleashing hysterical outrage, in which facts completely give way to emotions, generated by breaking cultural taboos, appealing to the natural human reflex of compassion (“fresh graves will always move”, like the bard sang) and directing the aroused emotions against PiS
– Ziemkiewicz emphasized in response.
There were and are no real reasons to connect the boy’s death with the publication of Radio Szczecin or any other publication (as was the case in previous cases – in the Adamowicz case this was even emphasized in the justification of the verdict). Even the moment when the MP made the accusations public, immediately supported by the speech of Tusk and his entire orchestrated group of political influencers, was not due to the turn of events, but to the political calendar. The person who broke the cultural taboo is not the one who exposed the PO’s double standards in the treatment of a pedophile in their party (perhaps the child would have lived if he was ‘like a priest’ and they had not tried to cover it up). the issue for so long), but the person who has long flaunted her pathological hatred of PiS, a mother who did not hesitate to use her own child for political death. To point out that she bears most of the blame for the fact that the boy attempted suicide again is clear and necessary in this situation to defend public life against this constantly repeated and, unfortunately, despite all its morally repugnant, effective, hyanic policy.
– added.
I constantly recommend my latest film about propaganda and police operations, as well as previous films devoted to the phenomenon of “necropolitics”
– he emphasized.
“You pour water under the likes”
You pour water on the likes. One question: what do you mean by “covering up the scandal”? A cover-up occurs when the perpetrator is not at fault, but uses his influence. And the media knows about it, but remains silent. You probably write all this but don’t check the facts. And the discussion becomes stupid because it is based on some of your theories that suit you, but come from outer space. Yes, you can achieve some reach with this, but what’s the point?
– this is how the Onet journalist responded to the columnist’s next contribution.
tkwl/X
READ ALSO:
— Rafał Ziemkiewicz merciless towards “Wyborcza” and Agora. He referred to Bartkowiak’s words: “What does a zombie do? “It eats brains”
– Ziemkiewicz in Kanał Zero called Filiks a “patsy”. Storm on the Internet. “He is being attacked for creating a concise and truthful description of reality.”
Source: wPolityce