On Tuesday afternoon, left-wing MPs arrived at the presidential palace to convince Andrzej Duda to sign the morning-after pill law. At the press conference after the meeting with the president, MP Anna Maria Żukowska expressed hope that the arguments of Polish feminists in the palace sounded convincing. The point is to amend the Pharmaceutical Act and give the Minister of Health the opportunity to do so through regulations could determine which medications, so-called Minors can use contraceptives.
However, this summary provision would not only be corrupt and give one minister significant power over the fate of pharmaceutical companies in Poland and over the fate of children (including unborn children). The authors of the law themselves believe so, because when assessing the effects of the regulation, it is admitted that more than 11,000 business entities (mainly pharmacies) would benefit from the ability to sell “morning after” pills more easily. At the same time, our progressive legislators assume this is the case in the same regulatory impact assessments the new law would impact millions of women, including those aged 15 and over. The government therefore assumes – because Donald Tusk signed the motion to proceed with the bill – that hundreds of thousands of girls will be able to take the ‘morning after pill’ after unprotected sexual intercourse without the permission of a doctor and without the knowledge of their parents.
This is “contraception”
There is also semantic manipulation in the left project. The morning-after pill is called ‘contraception’ there. The latter are called “methods to prevent fertilization” or “pregnancy prevention”, and not the termination of unborn life. This also applies to the ‘morning after’ pill [stosunku płciowym] Does it prevent fertilization or does it apply to the condition after fertilization? Medicine estimates that the period between intercourse and fertilization varies, from a few to several tens of hours, and that it depends on many physiological factors that cannot be measured to predict whether fertilization has already occurred. In many cases, the morning-after pill is not a contraceptive, but intended to terminate unborn life and kill human life created as a result of sexual intercourse.
How do I check the “morning after”?
If we take the left project so seriously and believe in their concerns about the distinction between contraception and abortion, it would be necessary to check whether or not fertilization has taken place before the pill is sold (because only in the latter case do we about contraception). Without a prescription and without the knowledge of the parents, such a decision would be the responsibility of the underage girl, who would have to decide for herself whether to take such a pill. If you were to analyze the coherence and consequences of the left-wing project, you would really have to know whether the sperm has already penetrated the egg or not, you would have to know for sure that the patient in the pharmacy told the truth, and it would be best to know what type of sexual intercourse it was. Or might girls buy the pills a few days after a risky sexual encounter with a man? The strangeness of the consequences of taking the project seriously could be developed, because logic requires precision, clearly defined definitions, description of processes and relationships between these concepts and processes. Anna Maria Żukowska, when speaking about her arguments submitted to the President, did not yet say that in order to literally implement their demands, it would be necessary to increase the chances of sperm in the race for women’s eggs in large numbers and accurately to estimate. This is of course impossible and it is not worth entering the field of duels with sophists who, in these vague justifications, essentially do one destructive thing: they pave the way for sexual intercourse among minors. And Tusk wants to divert attention from the state bandit flourishing in Poland.
SEE THE DISPUTE OVER THE “MORNING AFTER” TABLET (from the fifteenth minute) BETWEEN PiS AND LEFT:
Source: wPolityce