“Poor registration court – how dare it conduct a substantive review of the minister’s resolution?!” – MP Paweł Jabłoński ridiculed on social media the words of an expert from the oko.press portal who tried to discredit the registration court’s refusal on January 22 to register the curator of TVP and PR in the National Court Register.
Legal acrobatics offered to readers of the oko.press portal by former judge of the Constitutional Court, Prof. Mirosław Wyrzykowski – who explained that “the Constitution cannot be an obstacle to the restoration of the constitutional order” – PiS MP Paweł Jabłoński concluded to expose on social media.
However, this is not about the Constitution, which was not written by Law and Justice, and whose provisions so hinder the current government’s “restoration of sovereignty” today. Prof. Wyrzykowski comments on the fact that the registration court refused to register the trustee of TVP and PR in the National Court Register. This means that the entire takeover of the public media by Minister Sienkiewicz cannot be considered legal.
What can the registration court do?
The registry court, through the court’s legal secretary, went beyond the powers granted to it by carrying out a substantive review of the minister’s decision.
– explains, or rather judges, Prof. Miroslaw Wyrzykowski. And this is the claim – unfortunately for the former Constitutional Court judge – that Jabłoński verifies on social media.
Why it’s bullshit – and double down on it:
1. There was no “minister’s decision” – but resolutions of general meetings of companies and requests for access to the registration court
2. The registrar’s court has an OBLIGATION to carry out substantive checks on the application and the accompanying documents – and to always check whether they comply with the law. A court counselor is an arbitrator and not a notary (a notary cannot record everything, as a female notary is only now discovering).
– writes on Platform
A test is not a check?
MP Jabłoński also documents his submission with a quote from art. 23 of the Act of August 1997 on the National Judicial Register, where in point 1 it is written that “the registrar’s court examines whether the documents attached to the application comply with the legal provisions in form and content.”
Poor registration court – how dare it conduct a substantive review of the minister’s resolution?!
– he adds, recalling that “the author of this enlightened thought (from an interview in oko.press – editor’s note) also prof. M.Wyrzykowski – constitutionalist, former employee of the Officers’ College. Feliks Dzerzhinsky in Legionowo.
READ ALSO:
— The court’s justification for not including the trustees of TVP and PR in the register of the National Court crushes Sienkiewicz. The government is aware that it is acting illegally
– TVP legal authorities speak out about the refusal to be included in the National Court Register! There is a warning for usurpers: the board of directors reminds of the legal consequences
— Manipulation of Sienkiewicz’s ministry. He brags about the court’s decision and suggests the legality of the liquidation. Lewandowski: The announcement contains untruths
– OUR NEWS. The court rejected the request for registration of TVP’s curator in the National Court Register. Reference was made to the ruling of the Constitutional Court
X/rdm platform
Source: wPolityce