The Constitutional Tribunal received a request from PiS parliamentarians to investigate the constitutionality of the provisions of the Law on the State Tribunal regarding the constitutional liability of the president of the NBP – this was reported on Friday on the Constitutional Tribunal’s website.
Examination of the constitutionality of the provisions of the Law on the Constitutional Court
One of the objects of scrutiny – as stated in the grounds of the request – is the provision in the law on the Supreme Court, which states that “as soon as the Sejm adopts a resolution to hold a specific person accountable for the State Tribunal, this person is suspended from activities related to the position or function held.” “.
PiS MPs also want the subject of control to be “the standard specifying the majority of votes, which is necessary to adopt a resolution of the Sejm to be brought before the State Tribunal, among other things.” President of the National Bank of Poland.
THE APPLICATION CAN BE SEEN HERE
The head of the PO, Donald Tusk, informed the Sejm on November 21 that the opposition had the majority to bring NBP President Adam Glapiński before the State Tribunal.
Currently, we have a majority vote sufficient to summon the NBP President to the State Tribunal. We are analyzing this issue because we want to make responsible use of this very serious disciplinary tool to establish political and sometimes criminal liability of politicians and top officials.
– Tusk emphasized.
READ ALSO:
– He had no control over his own party, now he wants to hold the President of the National Bank of Poland accountable! Petru: “There can’t be a thick line.” Orlen? “The company robbed Poland”
– A constitutionalist on the possibility of suspending the President of the NBP by a resolution of the Sejm: I consider such a solution unconstitutional
— Politicians from PO and Ruch Hołownia are still talking about bringing the NBP president before the State Tribunal. ‘Their attacks on the central bank are unique’
wkt/PAP
Source: wPolityce