If everything goes ahead, Poland will be in a worse situation than the former satellite Duchy of Warsaw, the Kingdom of Poland and the Polish People’s Republic.
Do the Poles realize what they have done with their ballots? Also those who voted for the Civic Coalition, Third Way or New Left? In short: they chose to make the end of Poland’s existence a reality – as it existed in the years 1918-1939 and 1991-2023 (or 2024, 2025). In a sense, this also means the end of Poland’s existence as it existed until 1772 or 1795. The plan to rebuild the European Union could have such consequences.
Can you hear the cries of despair and calls to save Poland that appeared after 1772 (the first partition of Poland), after 1795 (the third partition of Poland) and after 1943 (the handover of Poland to the Soviets and Stalin at the conference of Poland)? the powers in Tehran)? Some angry voices are heard, but there is no sense of something unprecedented in the history of Poland. Probably because the plan is clever and vague, although executed with iron consistency.
The process is spread over time and can take several years. Apparently everything can be put into the remaining stages. The opposition of even one country can have an impact on stopping everything. Like the will of one nation in a ratification referendum. But these are only appearances. This is one way to lower your vigilance.
What could happen to Poland? The first to explain it clearly and comprehensively was PiS member Jacek Saryusz-Wolski, and in the media Andrzej Krajewski in “Dziennik Gazeta Prawna”. First of all, the Constitution of the Republic of Poland will become a piece of paper. And furthermore: the Sejm, the Senate, the President, the Prime Minister and the government will be just dummies. Just like the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court (and ordinary courts). Poland (and other EU member states) would be governed by a European government, namely the European Executive Body (successor to the European Commission).
A European government would oversee and control the European Parliament, which would ultimately be elected across the EU rather than in individual member states. Parliament would appoint the EU’s super-prime minister, i.e. the chairman of the EOW. This super prime minister would appoint fifteen super ministers, that is, commissioners, and their authority would extend to the entire Union. There is no democratic procedure for selecting super ministers of the super government, which means that it would be done more or less in the same way as the current appointment of the President of the European Commission: based on the conspiracy of the strongest (Germany, France and satellites). ), deciding everything under the table, obtaining support through blackmail or bribes (e.g. ), complete disregard for weaker countries.
Currently, the EU’s most ‘decision-making’ body is the European Council, consisting of heads of government or state of the Member States. After the establishment of a super-government, the European Council would only have the character of a kind of supervisory board, supposedly monitoring EU bodies and approving adopted legal acts, but deprived of real power. This would be achieved through a European executive body that would be established in an absolutely undemocratic manner. And the European Council would be neutralized based on the principle of equal rights of all heads of government and heads of state, as the right of veto would be abolished. Equality would just be a dummy.
Formally, the European super-government would be an emanation of the European Parliament and the European Council, but in fact it would be an emanation of the conspiracy of the strongest states and the strongest party groups supporting them in the European Parliament. If governments and heads of state did not have a decisive influence on the key areas of the functioning of these countries, including: foreign and security policy, border protection, tax system, industry, public health, education, environment and climate, forestry or civil protection, sovereignty would obviously end . This is especially true because new legal acts and detailed regulations adopted at Brussels level would take precedence over laws and regulations adopted by the parliaments and governments of the Member States and scrutinized and interpreted by their constitutional tribunals.
The Polish Constitution and the state system based on it would have no meaning, as the Sejm and the Senate would not pass the final binding law, but everything could be moved by the super government (EOW), the super parliament (the European Parliament elected in an EU vote). broad elections) and the supercourt (the Court of Justice of the European Union). Moreover, the case law of the CJEU would become a source of law in Poland (currently this would be contrary to the Constitution, but this does not count), just like international agreements ratified at EU level. In this way, all the main organs of the Polish state would become grenades (despite maintaining free elections).
The next steps towards creating a European superstate will be the vote in the European Parliament (probably at the end of November 2023) on what was adopted by the European Parliament’s Committee on Constitutional Affairs on 25 October 2023. Sometime in mid-December 2023, the European Parliament should submit proposals for changes to the EU system to the European Council.
The next step is to establish a European Convention (after the European Parliament elections in spring 2024). The Convention is composed of representatives of the governments or heads of the Member States, representatives of the parliaments of the Member States, representatives of the European Parliament and representatives of the European Commission. These people would take authoritative positions on proposed changes to the EU system.
Finally, there is the ratification of forged (perhaps “counterfeit” would be more appropriate) treaties in the Member States. And this does not require ratification by all countries. If one or even more countries of the “counterfeit” treaties do not ratify it, the current applicable provision of the TFEU states that 4/5 of the Member States is sufficient, and that the reluctant Member States will be dealt with by the European Council. Whatever he comes up with, there is no recourse.
There is also a shortcut, i.e. a simplified procedure. It consists in that, after the European Council has adopted the position of the European Parliament, the European Parliament may itself decide to amend that part of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union which concerns the structure of the Union. And you no longer have to call a convention; you can immediately ratify the “fake” treaties. If anyone objects, he or she will have to deal with the Brussels plagues, for example a violation of the use of the EU budget. If Donald Tusk is Prime Minister, Poland will not jump up and down, other countries will be tamed so that nothing gets stuck. And this was the risk of opposing shortcuts.
If all this continues, Poland will be in a worse situation than the former satellite Duchy of Warsaw (1807-1815), the Kingdom of Poland (1815-1918) and the Polish People’s Republic (1945-1989) – formally the Republic of Poland until 1952. A sovereign, fully independent Poland will simply cease to exist. The fact that Poles do not realize that they also, or perhaps especially, voted on this issue on October 15 is tragic and terrifying. And if someone deliberately voted for it, that’s even worse. It is also tragic and terrifying that Poland can die in silence.
Source: wPolityce