Another conflict is brewing on the axis Brussels, Berlin – Warsaw. The EU will want to impose a single definition of rape on all countries, force them to recognize gender as a cultural construct and use the fight against violence to push left-wing social doctrine.
In July, the European Parliament will vote on a directive to combat violence against women. It was developed and presented by the European Commission in March. The EU regulations will be enforced, despite the objections of several countries, including Poland, expressed at the European Council. Eurocrats will pay no attention to anything, as happened with the signing of the Istanbul Treaty by the EU. In the autumn of 2021, contrary to the existing practices and provisions of the treaties, the CJEU decided that unanimity at the European Council on this issue was not necessary, so after 6 years of disputes, the majority voted in favor of ratification. Moreover, opinions are already appearing in the German media that the Polish Constitutional Tribunal, after ratification, cannot declare the Istanbul Convention incompatible with our constitution, so that we must abide by it, whether we Poles like it or not. The government has submitted a question to the Constitutional Court about this.
There is every indication that a similar, strong solution will be used in the case of the directive on combating violence against women. Objections are raised, among other things, by the use of language full of politically correct gibberish and ideological references. As in the Istanbul Convention, gender is no longer an objective biological fact, but becomes a cultural construct: gender. This term appears 25 times in the guideline and has effectively supplanted the normally understood gender. So we have the convention “gender, harmful stereotypes”and officials must turn to others “gender sensitive” (gender sensitive way).
The biggest resistance, however, is the attempt to impose a uniform definition of rape. Any sexual act/intercourse without the express consent of either party is considered such. In Poland and in many other countries, rape is considered an act that occurred as a result of violence, deception or threats. The expanded EU definition of rape is being pushed by eg Sweden, which held the presidency until June 30, and Germany. In practice, however, it is about acknowledging the norms imposed by the left across Europe. This is the idea not only of individual countries, but also of the European left – the political formation with the greatest influence in the Union and its institutions. At the EP level, the directive and new definitions, eg rape, are being pushed by the Commission for Women and Equality (FEMM), chaired by Robert Biedroń. He is undoubtedly a man who has a lot to say about violence against women, as his mother can attest. Biedroń not only has theoretical knowledge, but also gained it in practice.
The issue of a new, uniform definition of rape is a very delicate one and will undoubtedly be used as a political tool against countries such as Poland or Hungary. This is evidenced by the behavior of the German media. They are already beginning to form the image of Poland as a country where women are discriminated against and there is some kind of permission for violence against them. This nonsense is especially around leftist politicians like Joanna Scheuring-Wielgus or Agnieszka Dziemianowicz-Bąk. The German daily newspaper “Deutsche Welle” directly manipulates in an article of June 28 by writing that “Poland, Bulgaria and Hungary have condemned the idea of introducing EU laws that protect women in general.” It is a false suggestion that women in these countries are not protected or even outlawed. Berlin also points out that it has no idea about the Polish legal order “feminicides”. Of course, Germany, where the categories inhuman and superhuman have been introduced, is a country with a great tradition in the legal differentiation of people, especially on the basis of ethnic origin. The same goes for gender distributions. It is no coincidence that they were the country where most women were burned at the stake. Looking back at one’s own history should encourage restraint in imposing one’s cultural patterns on others, but Germans have no inhibitions. They also want to use cultural and ideological issues as a tool to build their position as an EU superstate.
The Council’s position disappointed us (opposition to standardization of the definition of rape – editor’s note). Member States try to hide their competence in family matters, but national law should not be an excuse
– says Robert Biedroń in an interview with the German daily newspaper “Deutsche Welle”.
And here we get to the heart of the matter. This is another usurpation, an attempt to expand the Union’s legislative powers. Family law and ideological issues are the exclusive domain of the Member States. This therefore includes Poland, for example, not yet being forced to adopt a new definition of marriage, recognizing same-sex unions as such. The EU, through new definitions and new documents, is trying to strip us of these powers and impose pathological cultural norms on the European left. There is also no doubt that Brussels wants to extend its powers to the point of withholding money, imposing sanctions by falsely saying that Poland, for example by not including same-sex marriage in its legal order, is violating human rights.
Such a tool, a penalty bat, will in any case be used. For example, we will not agree to send us illegal immigrants, we will be accused of discrimination against women, allowing rape, whatever. So it is not only about ideological madness, but also about the ways of subordinating countries that, like Poland, have “wrong” governments.
It can of course be argued that the adoption of a uniform EU definition of rape would allow a better fight against this phenomenon. Why? Why should we adopt the legal and cultural norms of countries, organizations that are much worse than us in the fight against violence against women, or crime in general. Why don’t the Germans adopt our concepts and standards?
Poland has had the best so-called violence indicators for years. In other words, rapes, domestic violence or violence against women take place much less often than elsewhere in Poland. Of course, this is also a problem in Poland, but on a scale that is incomparably smaller than in Sweden or Germany, for example. Developed by the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE), the average European index for violence against women is 27.5 points out of 100 (the higher the score, the worse). Poland is in first place with an index of 22.1. Bulgaria is in last place with 44.2 points.
Poland is very good – the best position in this respect was previously confirmed by the research of the Fundamental Rights Agency. According to our feminists and excited activists on the left, Poland’s great achievements only meant that Polish women were stupid and cowardly. Well, out of cowardice, they don’t inform the police about rapes, acts of violence against them, or they are too stupid to admit that they happened. Swedes who are wise and enlightened know that they have been victims of violence and that is why such high scores for Swedes, and stupid, retarded Polish women do not know.
The problem is very serious and protecting our “companies” in terms of social and cultural norms is fundamental to security, crime rates, social and family relationships. It is clear that if we accept that of the progressive, enlightened West, sooner or later we will sink into the same pathologies that consume it.
Source: wPolityce