Citizens of the Commonwealth of Valencia stay with them. This is evident in the survey conducted by the Invest Group for INFORMATION, Levante-EMV and Mediterráneo-El Periódico de Castellón, which found that the assessment of regional political leaders was higher than that of national leaders in all cases. And all this despite the fact that the degree of knowledge they have about them is less than that of their leader. The biggest difference is registered in Unides PodemAlthough Ximo Puig benefits more from Pedro Sánchez than Feijoó and Carlos Mazón.
Political tension in Madrid is rejected by voters
The data provided by the survey is final. reflect the differences in assessment between regional and national leaders It may be directly related to the tension in Spanish politics, which is perceived as rejection by the voters.
Starting with PP. district candidate Carlos Mazón achieved a valuation of 5.11 compared to 4.64 of Alberto Núñez Feijóo, the party’s national chairman.. Given that the Galician leader is recognized by 81.6% of the respondents, these percentages clearly contradict the knowledge level of both politicians, given that the Valencian leader remains at 40.2%. The explanation for Mazón’s better appreciation may lie in the decline in popularity recorded by Feijóo, who came with high expectations for the PP’s national presidency but has already recorded wear and tear as a result of disappointing opposition work. in some sectors. The regional candidate, on the other hand, benefits from being seen as more valuable among those who know him, despite his low reputation.
If the difference in valuation is notable in the case of PP, it is more in PSPV. The current chairman of the Council, Ximo Puig scored 4.95, well above the 3.82 achieved by the Head of Government. and Socialists General Secretary Pedro Sánchez. The knowledge level of both has the least difference, with 92.2% for Puig and 98.3% for Sánchez. And here national politics re-enters the scene. Despite both facing a complex legislature, he became chairman of the Spanish Executive Committee, which was at its worst in a scenario where it had to deal with constant attacks from the opposition. a constant reference to “sanchismo” that slowly permeates among the voters. Puig, meanwhile, has demonstrated a more permeable presidency and a government-for-all spirit that is better perceived by the electorate.
In terms of score, the biggest difference comes in Unides Podem with Héctor Illueca’s 4.57 and Ione Belarra’s 2.98.
More Pit was the salvageable Ciudadanos. Generalitat Presidential candidate Mamen Peris got 4.73 points, while Inés Arrimadas got 3.86 points. And the fact that only 14.8% of respondents recognize the Valencian leader is data that contradicts 74.5% of Catalan politics. But most voters associate Arrimadas with the collapse of oranges.
The difference in Vox is also significant, 4.75 for Carlos Flores and 3.47 for Santiago Abascal. The biggest difference in the degree of knowledge between the two politicians was recorded in this party, with only 14.7% in the first and 93.7% in the second. Once again, a degree of ignorance can play in the regional candidate’s favour.
Finally, Héctor Illueca, Minister of Housing and candidate for the Unides Podem Generalitat, far surpasses Minister Ione Belarra in the citizen assessment with 4.57 and 2.98 points, respectively. And also, only 16.3% of citizens know about the Valencian candidate, compared to 55.1% who identify Belarra. Controversies such as the “only yes is yes” law or conflicts with Yolanda Díaz over Sumar may be behind this notable difference in valuation.