He withheld the execution of sentences for dangerous criminals, suggested to the Ombudsman that he stand up for criminals, and when he was finally transferred to another department, he appealed to the National Court Register. In vain. We are talking about Piotr Gąciarek from the Warsaw court. Members of the National Judicial Council today decided not to consider the judge’s appeal against the division of labor assigned to him after he was reappointed for trial by the Supreme Court’s Chamber of Professional Responsibility.
READ ALSO: OUR NEWS. Judge Gąciarek suspended the sentence for the mother who tortured the baby! He asked bizarre questions to the CJEU
In the Council’s communiqué, we read about the topic raised by the wPolityce.pl portal. It concerns a shocking decision by a judge who postponed the execution of a sentence against a brutal bandit and suggested that the Ombudsman lodge an appeal in cassation with the Supreme Court in favor of the bandit. All because of the alleged poor occupation of the court, which led the law to more severely condemn the criminal: OUR NEWS. A famous judge releases a dangerous criminal! He also wants the Ombudsman to file a cassation appeal in favor of the bandit
Judge Gąciarek refused to adjudicate with other judges who had received the recommendation from the National Court’s Register, not acknowledging the correctness of their nomination. . In February this year, the media reported, among other things, that judge Gąciarek postponed the execution of a prison sentence against a criminal who robbed and beat his victim. Piotr Gąciarek justified this by the fact that the ruling in this case was made by a judge appointed on the recommendation of the current National Judicial Council
– we read in the statement of the National Court Register.
The communiqué states that the Council therefore does not support the position of the KRS team that is handling the appeal from the court. The team noted that Judge Piotr Gąciarek’s division of duties relates to matters falling within the jurisdiction of a court reference or an official, which is not in the interests of the judiciary and is not justified. Therefore, he decided to recommend to the Council to adopt a position in which it will ask the President of the District Court in Warsaw to consider amending Judge Gąciarek’s division of duties and to consider his return to the Criminal Division of First Instance, but not to reasons stated in the appeal, but for the sake of justice.
There is arrears with the court in Warsaw and the action of Judge Gąciarek, which led to the suspension of the proceedings, has led, among other things, to the impossibility of serving prison sentences for convicts
– we read in the Council’s communiqué.
Piotr Gąciarek is an example of an irresponsible judicial activist whose actions could have contributed to chaos in the Polish judiciary. His consistent and unlawful undermining of the status of other judges posed a threat to the security of justice and led to shocking verdicts in the courtroom.
UK
Source: wPolityce