Journalist from “Gazeta Wyborcza” Dominika Wielowieyska wrote a text from which it follows that the entire opposition should submit to Donald Tusk, because it is good for the opposition to have one leader, and that should be the leader of the largest party – Donald Tusk . Her article sparked outrage online.
Should Komorowski and Zandberg add their pennies?
— this is the significant title of Wielowieyska’s text. In the middle the author the former president’s statement for “Wprost” that he is unlikely to go to the march organized by the PO on June 4 and laments that “the beautiful anniversary of defeating communism with the use of a ballot paper becomes a source of confrontation and the subject of competition between democratic forces.” She also referred to Adrian Zandberg’s interview for Wirtualna Polska, in which he says the opposition is preoccupied with itself rather than talking about the programme.
Tusk, Holownia or Trzaskowski? It would be better for the opposition if one leader had a decisive advantage over the others
said Wielowieyska
Poles prefer power that is uniform, internally organized and knows what it wants to do and why. I have a clear leader. These features – whether someone likes it or not – Jarosław Kaczyński has
she stressed.
The “GW” journalist tried to defend herself that her analysis was not “commissioned by Tusk”.
It would be better for the opposition if one leader had a clear advantage over the others, as this enhances the image of the camp. And it’s not that I support Tusk and his desire to dominate the opposition camp – it’s just a description of some obvious mechanisms in politics. (…) I have already heard allegations that such analysis is ordered by Tusk to subordinate other parties. Well no, this analysis shows that whoever is the leader of the strongest party should be recognized by the rest of the leaders as a candidate for the prime minister and that the opposition cannot be offended because it weakens the whole camp
she wrote.
A wave of reactions after Wielowieyska’s text
Dominika Wielowieyska’s article caused a storm in the network.
You can deny it, swear by newspaper reality, but the days of the slogan “Tusk, you have to” are long gone. He is the leader of the PO, not the opposition. It has a strongly negative electorate, apart from the 8 star slogan it has no sensible vision or program proposal. He has charisma only among the strong together
Should Komorowski and Zandberg exist at all? Why is the existence of parties other than PiS and PO allowed at all? It’s time to end it!
Wyborcza’s manipulations and lies are becoming more and more pathetic – please break away from Zandberg and take care of stubborn conservative Catholic Tusk, who is a burden to the entire opposition and the biggest obstacle in defeating PIS
I didn’t know that Wielowieyska was the chief of staff of the opposition
Do things like this for the viewers. Shame.
The “GW” journalist tried to defend himself in a Twitter post.
In football, the team that has its scorer and players that play as a team don’t just win against each other. Together they execute the strategy. It is the same in politics. So I don’t know where the outrage against my text comes from
she stressed Dominika Wielowieyska.
As you can see, according to Dominika Wielowieyska, the opposition’s chances of electoral victory would increase if all formations submitted to Donald Tusk. Is it no coincidence that the programme, a constructive offer for Poland, is more important? That of the PO – apart from a few loosely thrown slogans in the form of “grandmothers” or 0 percent loans. – still not there.
tkwl/wyborcza.pl/Twitter
Source: wPolityce