President Przyłębska reprimands rebellious judges: “I oblige you to immediately assume the duties of a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal”

The president of the Constitutional Court has sent letters to several judges – rebels who did not appear today at a very important meeting of the Constitutional Court, scheduled for May 30, on the amendment of the Supreme Court law. Madam President strongly reminds the judges of their duties.

READ ALSO: OUR NEWS. We know when the Constitutional Tribunal will consider amending the Supreme Court law! There is a certain date

pl/polityka/642396-nasz-news-wiemy-kiedy-tk-zajmie-sie-nowela-ustawy-o-sn

(…) in view of the unjustified absence from the meeting of Kp 1/23 on April 13, which was attended by the majority of the judges of the Constitutional Tribunal, the Judge, as President of the Constitutional Tribunal and the President of the jury panel, to immediately assume the duties of a judge of the Constitutional Tribunal, to which the judge committed himself by taking the oath before the President of the Republic of Poland and agreeing to be elected by the Sejm of the Republic of Poland.Refusal to participate in the deliberation is a breach of the duties of the judge, who cannot freely decide which deliberation or hearing to participate in. By not participating in the work of the Constitutional Court, you prevent other judges from administering justice. Not recognizing the position of the majority of judges of the Constitutional Court is also a violation of the principles of the functioning of a legal person

– writes the president of the Constitutional Court, Julia Przyłębska, to the rebels.

The letter was posted by the President of the Constitutional Court on her social profile, Prof. Krystyna Pawłowicz, Judge of the Constitutional Court.

Friends! We invite you to work as requested by the President

– wrote Prof. Pawlowicz.

The absence of judges from today’s deliberation is a glaring example of irresponsibility and debunks the narrative that rebellious judges have a pro-state purpose. Let’s hope they take President Przyłębska’s words to heart. The question of amending the law on the Supreme Court cannot be extended by a judicial dispute.

UK