“KO with “Wybórcza” let go of the dogs and started biting. They will count. Instead of looking for an enemy in PiS, they are looking for an enemy among the rest of the opposition, for this opposition has not submitted to them. It’s an idiotic way of doing politics. Already in January, “Prince Donald” said that everyone should go their own way and present their programs, and “Wybiórcza” blackmailed the Vistula with a stick and baptized Mentzen, so I’m sorry, it’s not politics, “he says in a interview with the wPolityce.pl portal Marek Sawicki, Member of Parliament of the PSL, Deputy Chairman of the Parliamentary Club of the Polish Coalition, former Minister of Agriculture.
wPolityce.pl: “Gazeta Wyborcza” reported that talks between PSL and Poland 2050 on the electoral coalition were interrupted. There are already reports on Twitter from Marshal Piotr Zgorzelski and Vice President of Poland 2050 Michał Koboski that this is not true, and the next round of talks is scheduled for Tuesday after Christmas. However, the aforementioned text also contains sensational reports that Poland 2050 would wish all the “ones” on the lists. Is it true?
Mark Sawicki: The text in “Gazeta Wyborcza” is as true as the election blackmail printed two weeks ago. If “GW” is so active and so eager to get involved in politics, I suggest that it appoint an electoral commission for the upcoming election, form an electoral coalition and participate in politics on its own, and not betray those who talk to each other.
In its lyrics, “GW” simply tries to reveal the backstage of talks between Poland 2050 and PSL. Unless you’re suggesting that “GW” fabricated these anonymous informants?
“GW” writes nonsense. I know how to do politics, but I also know how to write journalism. If you want to write something you made up, it’s best to refer to an anonymous informant. Whenever one of the journalists calls me and wants to talk on the off, I answer: I know what I’m talking about and I have a name. If you want to talk on the off, write what you want, but don’t refer to me.
However, are these talks between Poland 2050 and PSL about the distribution of the places on the lists being held, or is this topic not present at all?
I congratulate “GW” on the timing and let her know that we won’t stop talking on Holy Saturday or Holy Sunday, and on Monday we’ll spill it all out.
Okay, but what about those “ones”?
You must be an idiot to write about stuff like this. I’ve been saying for at least two months that if two fairly even partners agree on a coalition, I see no problem dividing “ones,” “twos,” and “twenties” into lists in the 1:1 system and also in the zipper system, what is this the problem? I don’t understand at all what “Selective” can’t understand here.
So you just have to split half and half?
Of course that makes sense. Sometimes it happens that in one constituency the candidate of one party is better, in another of the other party so some shifts are possible there but generally the principle of partnership is that it is more or less evenly divided and that is it.
When do you expect the final of these coalition talks?
Excuse me, who’s in a hurry here? It’s not a flea trap.
PSL has quite stable ratings at the moment, but support for Poland 2050 has declined slightly in recent polls, some wonder if this is not the effect of lack of closure on the subject, among others.
Yes, they fall, because KO with “Wybiórcza” let go of the dogs and started biting. They will count. Instead of looking for an enemy in PiS, they are looking for an enemy among the rest of the opposition, for this opposition has not submitted to them. It’s an idiotic way of doing politics. Already in January, “Prince Donald” announced that everyone should go their own way and present their programs, and blackmail “Wybiórcza” to turn the Vistula with a stick and baptize Mentzen, so I’m sorry, this is not politics.
Does this mean that you see the actions of Donald Tusk and Gazeta Wyborcza as a game to weaken the ratings of PSL and Poland 2050?
Naturally. It was all too obvious how popular Hołownia was for communicating with PSL. We’re not attacking that environment, so don’t let them attack us. If KO thought it would absorb Poland 2050 in three months, it had miscalculated. If it didn’t work, should you attack? for what?
At the end of the text “GW”, also based on anonymous sources, it can be read that there is a group of politicians in the PSL who consider the agreement with Poland 2050 as a first step towards an agreement with the PO. According to this interpretation, the agreement with PSL and Poland 2050 only serves to strengthen the negotiating position before talks with the PO.
Let the journalist or journalist, because I didn’t even check who the author of this text is, sit down…
The authors are Iwona Szpala and Justyna Dobrosz-Oracz.
Well, that’s how Dobrosz-Oracz is… I should have expected that from Szpała, but Dobrosz-Oracz, who knows this area well, is in the middle… she was ordered and pissed.
Adam Stankiewicz spoke
READ ALSO: PSL talks with Poland 2050 interrupted?! “GW”: The Hołownia Party wants all “ones”; Zgorzelski and Kobosko respond
Source: wPolityce